Compare commits
1 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
 Hermes Pipeline
|
a2433251cd |
@@ -1,67 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: blacknode-text-concatenation-workflow
|
||||
version: 1.0.0
|
||||
description: Concatenate two text strings using a Blacknode graph of Text, Concat,
|
||||
and Output nodes.
|
||||
inputs:
|
||||
- 'text_a: string'
|
||||
- 'text_b: string'
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
- Initialize a Blacknode Graph object.
|
||||
- Add a Text node with parameter value set to text_a.
|
||||
- Add a second Text node with parameter value set to text_b.
|
||||
- Add a Concat node (no parameters required).
|
||||
- Add an Output node (no parameters required).
|
||||
- Connect the 'value' output port of the first Text node to the 'a' input port of
|
||||
the Concat node.
|
||||
- Connect the 'value' output port of the second Text node to the 'b' input port of
|
||||
the Concat node.
|
||||
- Connect the 'value' output port of the Concat node to the 'value' input port of
|
||||
the Output node.
|
||||
- Evaluate the graph by cooking the Output node's 'value' port to obtain the concatenated
|
||||
result.
|
||||
outputs:
|
||||
- 'concatenated_text: string'
|
||||
tags: []
|
||||
metadata:
|
||||
source_repo: https://github.com/temiroff/Blacknode.git
|
||||
extracted_at: ''
|
||||
confidence: 0.95
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# blacknode-text-concatenation-workflow
|
||||
|
||||
Concatenate two text strings using a Blacknode graph of Text, Concat, and Output nodes.
|
||||
|
||||
## Steps
|
||||
|
||||
1. Initialize a Blacknode Graph object.
|
||||
2. Add a Text node with parameter value set to text_a.
|
||||
3. Add a second Text node with parameter value set to text_b.
|
||||
4. Add a Concat node (no parameters required).
|
||||
5. Add an Output node (no parameters required).
|
||||
6. Connect the 'value' output port of the first Text node to the 'a' input port of the Concat node.
|
||||
7. Connect the 'value' output port of the second Text node to the 'b' input port of the Concat node.
|
||||
8. Connect the 'value' output port of the Concat node to the 'value' input port of the Output node.
|
||||
9. Evaluate the graph by cooking the Output node's 'value' port to obtain the concatenated result.
|
||||
|
||||
## Inputs
|
||||
|
||||
- text_a: string
|
||||
- text_b: string
|
||||
|
||||
## Outputs
|
||||
|
||||
- concatenated_text: string
|
||||
|
||||
## Failure Modes
|
||||
|
||||
- Node types 'Text', 'Concat', or 'Output' not registered in Blacknode runtime
|
||||
- Port name mismatches during edge creation
|
||||
- Missing input values causing empty concatenation
|
||||
- Graph evaluation error if cycles or disconnected required ports
|
||||
|
||||
## Source
|
||||
|
||||
Extracted from: [https://github.com/temiroff/Blacknode.git](https://github.com/temiroff/Blacknode.git)
|
||||
Confidence: 0.95
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Commands: blacknode-text-concatenation-workflow
|
||||
|
||||
## Available Commands
|
||||
|
||||
- `/skill blacknode-text-concatenation-workflow` — Load this skill
|
||||
- `/run blacknode-text-concatenation-workflow` — Execute workflow
|
||||
@@ -1,10 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Examples: blacknode-text-concatenation-workflow
|
||||
|
||||
## Usage Example
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# How to use this skill
|
||||
# Inputs: text_a: string, text_b: string
|
||||
# Process: Initialize a Blacknode Graph object. → Add a Text node with parameter value set to text_a. → Add a second Text node with parameter value set to text_b.
|
||||
# Outputs: concatenated_text: string
|
||||
```
|
||||
@@ -1,33 +0,0 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "blacknode-text-concatenation-workflow",
|
||||
"version": "1.0.0",
|
||||
"goal": "Concatenate two text strings using a Blacknode graph of Text, Concat, and Output nodes.",
|
||||
"inputs": [
|
||||
"text_a: string",
|
||||
"text_b: string"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"steps": [
|
||||
"Initialize a Blacknode Graph object.",
|
||||
"Add a Text node with parameter value set to text_a.",
|
||||
"Add a second Text node with parameter value set to text_b.",
|
||||
"Add a Concat node (no parameters required).",
|
||||
"Add an Output node (no parameters required).",
|
||||
"Connect the 'value' output port of the first Text node to the 'a' input port of the Concat node.",
|
||||
"Connect the 'value' output port of the second Text node to the 'b' input port of the Concat node.",
|
||||
"Connect the 'value' output port of the Concat node to the 'value' input port of the Output node.",
|
||||
"Evaluate the graph by cooking the Output node's 'value' port to obtain the concatenated result."
|
||||
],
|
||||
"outputs": [
|
||||
"concatenated_text: string"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"failure_modes": [
|
||||
"Node types 'Text', 'Concat', or 'Output' not registered in Blacknode runtime",
|
||||
"Port name mismatches during edge creation",
|
||||
"Missing input values causing empty concatenation",
|
||||
"Graph evaluation error if cycles or disconnected required ports"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"confidence": 0.95,
|
||||
"explanation": "Extracted from examples/converted_text_pipeline.py and referenced templates/text-pipeline.json in the Blacknode repo. This workflow is a foundational, dependency-free pattern for building directed graphs of typed nodes and is applicable to any simple data combination task.",
|
||||
"source_repo": "https://github.com/temiroff/Blacknode.git",
|
||||
"score": 1.0
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: conditional-request-routing-workflow
|
||||
version: 1.0.0
|
||||
description: Collect a request, classify it via branching logic, and route to an approval
|
||||
or rejection handler to produce a final result
|
||||
inputs:
|
||||
- name: request
|
||||
type: string
|
||||
description: The input text or request to be evaluated and routed
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
- node: Start
|
||||
agent_type: input
|
||||
description: Prompt user and capture the request into state field 'request'
|
||||
next: Classify
|
||||
- node: Classify
|
||||
agent_type: branching
|
||||
description: Evaluate the request and set 'decision' field, routing to Approve on
|
||||
success or Reject on failure
|
||||
input_fields:
|
||||
- request
|
||||
output_field: decision
|
||||
next_node: Approve
|
||||
on_failure: Reject
|
||||
- node: Approve
|
||||
agent_type: default
|
||||
description: Format and output an approval message containing the request
|
||||
input_fields:
|
||||
- request
|
||||
output_field: result
|
||||
prompt: 'Request approved: {request}'
|
||||
- node: Reject
|
||||
agent_type: default
|
||||
description: Format and output a rejection message containing the request
|
||||
input_fields:
|
||||
- request
|
||||
output_field: result
|
||||
prompt: 'Request rejected: {request}'
|
||||
outputs:
|
||||
- name: result
|
||||
type: string
|
||||
description: Final formatted message indicating the outcome (approved or rejected)
|
||||
- name: decision
|
||||
type: string
|
||||
description: Routing decision produced by the branching node
|
||||
tags: []
|
||||
metadata:
|
||||
source_repo: https://github.com/jwwelbor/AgentMap.git
|
||||
extracted_at: ''
|
||||
confidence: 0.92
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# conditional-request-routing-workflow
|
||||
|
||||
Collect a request, classify it via branching logic, and route to an approval or rejection handler to produce a final result
|
||||
|
||||
## Steps
|
||||
|
||||
1. {'node': 'Start', 'agent_type': 'input', 'description': "Prompt user and capture the request into state field 'request'", 'next': 'Classify'}
|
||||
2. {'node': 'Classify', 'agent_type': 'branching', 'description': "Evaluate the request and set 'decision' field, routing to Approve on success or Reject on failure", 'input_fields': ['request'], 'output_field': 'decision', 'next_node': 'Approve', 'on_failure': 'Reject'}
|
||||
3. {'node': 'Approve', 'agent_type': 'default', 'description': 'Format and output an approval message containing the request', 'input_fields': ['request'], 'output_field': 'result', 'prompt': 'Request approved: {request}'}
|
||||
4. {'node': 'Reject', 'agent_type': 'default', 'description': 'Format and output a rejection message containing the request', 'input_fields': ['request'], 'output_field': 'result', 'prompt': 'Request rejected: {request}'}
|
||||
|
||||
## Inputs
|
||||
|
||||
- {'name': 'request', 'type': 'string', 'description': 'The input text or request to be evaluated and routed'}
|
||||
|
||||
## Outputs
|
||||
|
||||
- {'name': 'result', 'type': 'string', 'description': 'Final formatted message indicating the outcome (approved or rejected)'}
|
||||
- {'name': 'decision', 'type': 'string', 'description': 'Routing decision produced by the branching node'}
|
||||
|
||||
## Failure Modes
|
||||
|
||||
- Empty or missing request input prevents meaningful classification
|
||||
- Branching node fails to resolve a valid route and defaults to rejection path
|
||||
- Prompt template variable missing causes malformed output
|
||||
|
||||
## Source
|
||||
|
||||
Extracted from: [https://github.com/jwwelbor/AgentMap.git](https://github.com/jwwelbor/AgentMap.git)
|
||||
Confidence: 0.92
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# Commands: conditional-request-routing-workflow
|
||||
|
||||
## Available Commands
|
||||
|
||||
- `/skill conditional-request-routing-workflow` — Load this skill
|
||||
- `/run conditional-request-routing-workflow` — Execute workflow
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
||||
# Examples: conditional-request-routing-workflow
|
||||
|
||||
## Usage Example
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# How to use this skill
|
||||
# Inputs: {'name': 'request', 'type': 'string', 'description': 'The input text or request to be evaluated and routed'}
|
||||
# Process: {'node': 'Start', 'agent_type': 'input', 'description': "Prompt user and capture the request into state field 'request'", 'next': 'Classify'} → {'node': 'Classify', 'agent_type': 'branching', 'description': "Evaluate the request and set 'decision' field, routing to Approve on success or Reject on failure", 'input_fields': ['request'], 'output_field': 'decision', 'next_node': 'Approve', 'on_failure': 'Reject'} → {'node': 'Approve', 'agent_type': 'default', 'description': 'Format and output an approval message containing the request', 'input_fields': ['request'], 'output_field': 'result', 'prompt': 'Request approved: {request}'}
|
||||
# Outputs: {'name': 'result', 'type': 'string', 'description': 'Final formatted message indicating the outcome (approved or rejected)'}, {'name': 'decision', 'type': 'string', 'description': 'Routing decision produced by the branching node'}
|
||||
```
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "conditional-request-routing-workflow",
|
||||
"version": "1.0.0",
|
||||
"goal": "Collect a request, classify it via branching logic, and route to an approval or rejection handler to produce a final result",
|
||||
"inputs": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "request",
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "The input text or request to be evaluated and routed"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"steps": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"node": "Start",
|
||||
"agent_type": "input",
|
||||
"description": "Prompt user and capture the request into state field 'request'",
|
||||
"next": "Classify"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"node": "Classify",
|
||||
"agent_type": "branching",
|
||||
"description": "Evaluate the request and set 'decision' field, routing to Approve on success or Reject on failure",
|
||||
"input_fields": [
|
||||
"request"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"output_field": "decision",
|
||||
"next_node": "Approve",
|
||||
"on_failure": "Reject"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"node": "Approve",
|
||||
"agent_type": "default",
|
||||
"description": "Format and output an approval message containing the request",
|
||||
"input_fields": [
|
||||
"request"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"output_field": "result",
|
||||
"prompt": "Request approved: {request}"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"node": "Reject",
|
||||
"agent_type": "default",
|
||||
"description": "Format and output a rejection message containing the request",
|
||||
"input_fields": [
|
||||
"request"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"output_field": "result",
|
||||
"prompt": "Request rejected: {request}"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"outputs": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "result",
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Final formatted message indicating the outcome (approved or rejected)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "decision",
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Routing decision produced by the branching node"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"failure_modes": [
|
||||
"Empty or missing request input prevents meaningful classification",
|
||||
"Branching node fails to resolve a valid route and defaults to rejection path",
|
||||
"Prompt template variable missing causes malformed output"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"confidence": 0.92,
|
||||
"explanation": "Extracted from the ReviewFlow CSV example in the AgentMap README. This is a declarative, CSV-defined LangGraph workflow demonstrating the reusable pattern of input -> branching classification -> conditional handling paths. It can be generalized for ticket triage, content moderation, or any route-by-condition use case.",
|
||||
"source_repo": "https://github.com/jwwelbor/AgentMap.git",
|
||||
"score": 1.0
|
||||
}
|
||||
+1
-1
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
||||
# Tests: blacknode-text-concatenation-workflow
|
||||
# Tests: conditional-request-routing-workflow
|
||||
|
||||
## Test Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user