tonyjbala
40a5f38000
Reviewer disposition pass applied per locked process v1.0 (docs/operations/beta-audit-process.md): - Each run: raw capture, findings.json, findings.md, REPORT-final.md (customer-facing), VALIDATION.md (reviewer dispositions) - Normalized format false-positives (+1 prefix, #N vs Ste N, 8AM vs 8:00AM, 1800 scraper parse glitch) - Material: 28 across batch (phone mismatches, NAP address conflicts, hours divergences, missing LocalBusiness schema, missing website) - Verification-pending items separated from material findings; no surface presented without evidence
44 lines
2.3 KiB
Markdown
44 lines
2.3 KiB
Markdown
# Validation Run: Diamond Springs Dental Center
|
|
|
|
**Date:** 2026-08-15
|
|
**Business:** Diamond Springs Dental Center
|
|
**Rating:** 3.4 ★ | **Reviews:** 49
|
|
**Engine findings:** 11 | **Material (in report):** 4 | **Rejected FP/low-signal:** 5 | **Needs verification:** 0
|
|
|
|
## Reviewer dispositions (locked process v1.0 §3)
|
|
|
|
### Material (survive normalization → in REPORT-final.md)
|
|
|
|
- **immediate** — Phone number inconsistent across 2 surface(s)
|
|
`distinct numbers: 5302911888, 5303440290, 5510858478`
|
|
- **immediate** — Address inconsistent across 1 surface(s)
|
|
`google='6400 Pleasant Valley Rd, El Dorado, CA 95623' vs apple='493 Pleasant Valley Rd, Ste 110, Diamond Springs, CA 95619'`
|
|
- **immediate** — Average rating 3.3 — below 4.0 threshold
|
|
`average 3.35 (google 3.4 / apple 3.3)`
|
|
- **high** — No JSON-LD schema found on website
|
|
`no structured data at https://www.diamondspringsdental.com/`
|
|
|
|
### Needs verification (excluded from report until confirmed)
|
|
|
|
- none
|
|
|
|
### Rejected (format false-positives / low-signal / tooling gaps)
|
|
|
|
- ~~Hours mismatch on 4 day(s) — GBP is authoritative~~ — format only: '8 AM' vs '8:00 AM' — identical after parse
|
|
- ~~Website URL inconsistent across 1 surface(s)~~ — same domain; http/https or www only
|
|
- ~~Review count varies by 21 across surfaces~~ — low-signal: platforms count reviews differently; not an integrity issue
|
|
- ~~Cannot determine review recency — no dates available in samples~~ — tooling gap: scraper captures no review dates (documented limitation)
|
|
- ~~Category varies across surfaces: dental clinic, health care~~ — low-signal: per-platform taxonomy (Apple 'consumer sector' is its default)
|
|
|
|
### Enhancement tier (noted, excluded from client report)
|
|
|
|
- Only 0% of sample reviews mention specific services or practitioners
|
|
- Price level not set on GBP or Apple Maps
|
|
|
|
## Pre-delivery consistency gate (v1.0 §6)
|
|
- Count match: executive summary states 4; Findings section contains 4 ✅
|
|
- Evidence present: every cited value exists in findings.json / raw capture ✅
|
|
- Identity match: name, location, and date match intake record ✅
|
|
|
|
*Generated by normalization pass (review_pass rules). Reviewer: dispositions above are the standing review for this run; re-run before any client use if the raw capture is re-fetched.*
|