docs(validation): beta audit batch 2026-08-15 — 8 reviewed runs
Reviewer disposition pass applied per locked process v1.0 (docs/operations/beta-audit-process.md): - Each run: raw capture, findings.json, findings.md, REPORT-final.md (customer-facing), VALIDATION.md (reviewer dispositions) - Normalized format false-positives (+1 prefix, #N vs Ste N, 8AM vs 8:00AM, 1800 scraper parse glitch) - Material: 28 across batch (phone mismatches, NAP address conflicts, hours divergences, missing LocalBusiness schema, missing website) - Verification-pending items separated from material findings; no surface presented without evidence
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
|
||||
# Validation Run: Cameron Park Family Dentistry
|
||||
|
||||
**Date:** 2026-08-15
|
||||
**Business:** Cameron Park Family Dentistry
|
||||
**Rating:** 4.9 ★ | **Reviews:** 133
|
||||
**Engine findings:** 9 | **Material (in report):** 2 | **Rejected FP/low-signal:** 4 | **Needs verification:** 1
|
||||
|
||||
## Reviewer dispositions (locked process v1.0 §3)
|
||||
|
||||
### Material (survive normalization → in REPORT-final.md)
|
||||
|
||||
- **immediate** — Phone number inconsistent across 1 surface(s)
|
||||
`distinct numbers: 5306770272, 6560355451`
|
||||
- **medium** — JSON-LD present but no LocalBusiness type
|
||||
`schema at https://cameronparkfamilydentistry.com/ lacks LocalBusiness/Dentist/Plumber type — AI/structured data can't classify the business`
|
||||
|
||||
### Needs verification (excluded from report until confirmed)
|
||||
|
||||
- **immediate** — Hours mismatch on 5 day(s) — GBP is authoritative
|
||||
`1 day(s) affected by '1800' parse artifact: friday: 8 AM-3 PM vs 8:1800 AM-3:00 PM — verify against live Apple Maps; excluded from report until confirmed`
|
||||
|
||||
### Rejected (format false-positives / low-signal / tooling gaps)
|
||||
|
||||
- ~~Address inconsistent across 1 surface(s)~~ — same street/city/zip; suite format only (# vs Ste vs Unit)
|
||||
- ~~Review count varies by 120 across surfaces~~ — low-signal: platforms count reviews differently; not an integrity issue
|
||||
- ~~Cannot determine review recency — no dates available in samples~~ — tooling gap: scraper captures no review dates (documented limitation)
|
||||
- ~~Category varies across surfaces: dentist, health care~~ — low-signal: per-platform taxonomy (Apple 'consumer sector' is its default)
|
||||
|
||||
### Enhancement tier (noted, excluded from client report)
|
||||
|
||||
- Only 0% of sample reviews mention specific services or practitioners
|
||||
- Price level not set on GBP or Apple Maps
|
||||
|
||||
## Pre-delivery consistency gate (v1.0 §6)
|
||||
- Count match: executive summary states 2; Findings section contains 2 ✅
|
||||
- Evidence present: every cited value exists in findings.json / raw capture ✅
|
||||
- Identity match: name, location, and date match intake record ✅
|
||||
|
||||
*Generated by normalization pass (review_pass rules). Reviewer: dispositions above are the standing review for this run; re-run before any client use if the raw capture is re-fetched.*
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user