Files
athena-oracle/docs/vision/SPRINT_1_FINDINGS.md
T
Epictetus 3a42f53333 Vision Lock v1: AI News Aggregator -> AI Enthusiast Daily (ADR-0007)
- docs/vision/VISION_LOCK_V1.md: permanent editorial mission, audience (builders/tinkerers/
  local-AI users/home-lab/agent devs), Editorial Test ('what would an enthusiast DO?'),
  architectual constraint (editorial vision is primary system), priority order.
- docs/vision/ADR-0007_EDITORIAL_PIVOT.md: accepted pivot record, before/after table,
  Sprint 1 evidence (high-signal = actionable, low-signal = spectator content).
- docs/vision/EDITORIAL_GUIDELINES.md: operating rules; score is draft, taste overrides;
  hand-before-machine; memory must store 'what can be done' not 'what happened'.
- docs/vision/SECTION_DEFINITIONS.md: 5 sections (What Shipped / Run It Locally /
  Benchmarks & Builds / Problem Solved / Worth Trying Tonight).
- docs/vision/SPRINT_1_FINDINGS.md: reference evidence, 45/200 UNCATEGORIZED taxonomy gap.
- Issue_001.md: handcrafted prototype edition from Sprint 1 stories; benchmark for all future automation.

This is the architectural directive. No scoring/narrative/memory work proceeds except in
service of the Vision Lock. Sprint 2 (Lens) stays blocked pending manual review tallies.
2026-07-15 05:08:26 +00:00

58 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# SPRINT 1 FINDINGS — Reference Material
Raw evidence from the Sprint 1 manual review (200 stories, athena_review_report.txt). This document is **reference material for future decisions** — it records what the data actually showed so later tuning has a baseline.
---
## What We Learned
Sprint 1 was pure rules (no embeddings, no LLM, no semantic similarity) by founder directive: *discover the taxonomy before adding intelligence*. The classifier's job was not accuracy — it was to surface misclassifications as signal. It did.
## High Signal (ship)
Stories the editorial test would pass — reader can DO something:
- **Local AI** — gguf / rtx / quantization / llama.cpp. Highest enthusiast + replication scores.
- e.g. "I benched quad 5060Tis for code generation with Qwen3.6-27B" (final 0.50)
- "Voodoo Quant beats Unsloth Dynamic 2.0 KLD by 95%" (0.45)
- **Open-source tools** — things to install/run.
- "Show HN: Juggler open-source GUI coding agent" (0.57, highest in set)
- "Open Source Local LLM Training Tool (consumer hardware)" (0.46)
- "Zer0Fit — MCP server for zero-shot ML, 100% local" (0.300.46)
- **Benchmarks with real numbers** — reproducible, comparable.
- "GPUHedge: cold-start p95 117s→30s" (0.41)
- "Migrating to GPT-5.6: 2.2x faster, 27% cheaper" (0.41)
- **Infrastructure with code** — fixable, runnable.
- "Your $80 Tesla P100 silently noisy math in llama.cpp — 3-line fix, free" (0.32)
- **Production learnings** — transferable lessons.
- "The real bottleneck for AI agents may be proving who they are" (0.19)
- "AI agent crawlers now need permission" (0.25)
## Low Signal (reject)
Stories the editorial test would fail — reader does NOTHING:
- **Funding rounds** — PixVerse $439M, DeepSeek $7B. Money moved, no capability changed.
- **Lawsuits** — Apple/OpenAI trade secret, Google training suit. Spectator content.
- **CEO opinions** — Altman, Hassabis, Mosseri takes. Someone said something.
- **Valuations** — PixVerse $2B. Number, no action.
- **Corporate announcements** — Waze features, Spotify assistant, Siri beta. No reproducible substance.
## Taxonomy Gap (the real discovery)
- **45 / 200 (22.5%) UNCATEGORIZED.** Mostly Reddit/HN opinion + culture-adjacent pieces with no keyword hit (e.g. "Stop Telling Me to Ask an LLM", "Mesh LLM", "Ghost Font").
- This is **not a failure** — it's the editorial boundary made visible. The keyword set is narrower than taste. Tuning Sprint 2 (Lens) must start from these 45, not from classifier precision.
## Bucket distribution (200 reviewed)
| Bucket | n |
|--------|---|
| RESEARCH | 40 |
| INFRASTRUCTURE | 23 |
| UNCATEGORIZED | 45 |
| MODEL RELEASE | 24 |
| PROBLEM SOLVED | 19 |
| SHIPPING | 12 |
| CULTURE | 15 |
| BUSINESS | 13 |
| LOCAL AI | 9 |
## Open question for Sprint 2
When the Lens arrives, its first job is **not** to classify better. It's to explain *why* a story is or isn't actionable — and to propose a section (§SECTION_DEFINITIONS) for human confirmation. The 45 UNCATEGORIZED are the training set for that judgment, not the 155 that already matched.