Epictetus
5f917f4121
Publisher fixes: - Checkout new branch before push (was pushing main ref) - Verify files staged before commit - Handle duplicate files gracefully - Clean error reporting per stage Skills merged to main: - mcp-server-setup (from pipeshub-ai) - research-pipeline (from Blacknode) - multi-agent-sequential-workflow (from Fast-LLM-Agent-MCP) - unifai-workflow-execution (from UnifAI) - code-review-agent-workflow (from AgentKit)
24 lines
1.1 KiB
JSON
24 lines
1.1 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"name": "code-review-agent-workflow",
|
|
"version": "1.0.0",
|
|
"goal": "Automate the code review process using a multi-step workflow with human-in-the-loop approval.",
|
|
"inputs": [
|
|
"Sample diff of code changes (str)",
|
|
"Repo context (dict)"
|
|
],
|
|
"steps": [
|
|
"Step 1: Build the graph for the code review agent using `build_graph()` from `agentkit.workflow.code_review.graph`",
|
|
"Step 2: Invoke the graph with initial parameters including sample diff, repo context, user ID, and other metadata",
|
|
"Step 3: The graph processes the input through a series of steps, generating messages and issues as it progresses"
|
|
],
|
|
"outputs": [
|
|
"Final result containing processed messages and issues (dict)"
|
|
],
|
|
"failure_modes": [
|
|
"Specific failure scenario with mitigation: If the `build_graph()` function fails to initialize properly, ensure all required dependencies are correctly installed."
|
|
],
|
|
"confidence": 0.95,
|
|
"explanation": "This workflow is reusable for any code review process that requires a multi-step analysis and human approval.",
|
|
"source_repo": "https://github.com/itszhaoziyan-n/AgentKit.git",
|
|
"score": 1.0
|
|
} |