Compare commits
1 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| e20b5370e1 |
@@ -1,77 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
---
|
|
||||||
name: autonomous-web-research-agent
|
|
||||||
version: 1.0.0
|
|
||||||
description: Autonomously research a given query on the web using multiple search
|
|
||||||
tools and generate a structured report with summary, detailed sections, source tracking,
|
|
||||||
and bias analysis.
|
|
||||||
inputs:
|
|
||||||
- 'query (string): the research question or topic to investigate'
|
|
||||||
- 'tools (list, optional): selected web search/tools to use (e.g., Tavily, Google,
|
|
||||||
NewsAPI, DuckDuckGo)'
|
|
||||||
- 'api_keys (dict, optional): credentials for LLM and external search APIs'
|
|
||||||
- 'model_config (dict, optional): LLM provider and parameters'
|
|
||||||
steps:
|
|
||||||
- 1. Accept user query and optional tool selections.
|
|
||||||
- '2. Initialize agent framework (e.g., LangGraph) with integrated tools: web search
|
|
||||||
(Tavily, Google, DuckDuckGo), news API, web scraping.'
|
|
||||||
- 3. Decompose query into sub-questions if needed and iteratively call tools to gather
|
|
||||||
relevant information.
|
|
||||||
- 4. Extract and deduplicate content from retrieved sources, tracking source metadata
|
|
||||||
(URL, tool used).
|
|
||||||
- 5. Use a large language model to synthesize findings into an executive summary and
|
|
||||||
detailed sections.
|
|
||||||
- 6. Analyze potential biases or limitations of gathered sources.
|
|
||||||
- 7. Compile a structured report object (ResearchReport) containing query, summary,
|
|
||||||
sections, sources, biases.
|
|
||||||
- 8. Optionally present report via a UI (e.g., Streamlit) or return as JSON.
|
|
||||||
outputs:
|
|
||||||
- 'ResearchReport (JSON/dict) with fields: query (string), summary (string), sections
|
|
||||||
(list of {heading, content}), sources (list of {url, tool_used, title}), potential_biases
|
|
||||||
(string)'
|
|
||||||
- Optional UI rendering of report with source badges and expandable sections
|
|
||||||
tags: []
|
|
||||||
metadata:
|
|
||||||
source_repo: https://github.com/DennisDRX/Faraday-Web-Researcher-Agent.git
|
|
||||||
extracted_at: ''
|
|
||||||
confidence: 0.85
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# autonomous-web-research-agent
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Autonomously research a given query on the web using multiple search tools and generate a structured report with summary, detailed sections, source tracking, and bias analysis.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Steps
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
1. 1. Accept user query and optional tool selections.
|
|
||||||
2. 2. Initialize agent framework (e.g., LangGraph) with integrated tools: web search (Tavily, Google, DuckDuckGo), news API, web scraping.
|
|
||||||
3. 3. Decompose query into sub-questions if needed and iteratively call tools to gather relevant information.
|
|
||||||
4. 4. Extract and deduplicate content from retrieved sources, tracking source metadata (URL, tool used).
|
|
||||||
5. 5. Use a large language model to synthesize findings into an executive summary and detailed sections.
|
|
||||||
6. 6. Analyze potential biases or limitations of gathered sources.
|
|
||||||
7. 7. Compile a structured report object (ResearchReport) containing query, summary, sections, sources, biases.
|
|
||||||
8. 8. Optionally present report via a UI (e.g., Streamlit) or return as JSON.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Inputs
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- query (string): the research question or topic to investigate
|
|
||||||
- tools (list, optional): selected web search/tools to use (e.g., Tavily, Google, NewsAPI, DuckDuckGo)
|
|
||||||
- api_keys (dict, optional): credentials for LLM and external search APIs
|
|
||||||
- model_config (dict, optional): LLM provider and parameters
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Outputs
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- ResearchReport (JSON/dict) with fields: query (string), summary (string), sections (list of {heading, content}), sources (list of {url, tool_used, title}), potential_biases (string)
|
|
||||||
- Optional UI rendering of report with source badges and expandable sections
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Failure Modes
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- Missing or invalid API keys causing tool authentication failures
|
|
||||||
- Rate limits or network errors from search APIs
|
|
||||||
- Insufficient or low-quality search results leading to incomplete report
|
|
||||||
- LLM hallucination or mis-summarization despite source tracking
|
|
||||||
- Parsing errors in HTML/scraped content
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Source
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Extracted from: [https://github.com/DennisDRX/Faraday-Web-Researcher-Agent.git](https://github.com/DennisDRX/Faraday-Web-Researcher-Agent.git)
|
|
||||||
Confidence: 0.85
|
|
||||||
@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Commands: autonomous-web-research-agent
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Available Commands
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- `/skill autonomous-web-research-agent` — Load this skill
|
|
||||||
- `/run autonomous-web-research-agent` — Execute workflow
|
|
||||||
@@ -1,10 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Examples: autonomous-web-research-agent
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Usage Example
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```python
|
|
||||||
# How to use this skill
|
|
||||||
# Inputs: query (string): the research question or topic to investigate, tools (list, optional): selected web search/tools to use (e.g., Tavily, Google, NewsAPI, DuckDuckGo), api_keys (dict, optional): credentials for LLM and external search APIs, model_config (dict, optional): LLM provider and parameters
|
|
||||||
# Process: 1. Accept user query and optional tool selections. → 2. Initialize agent framework (e.g., LangGraph) with integrated tools: web search (Tavily, Google, DuckDuckGo), news API, web scraping. → 3. Decompose query into sub-questions if needed and iteratively call tools to gather relevant information.
|
|
||||||
# Outputs: ResearchReport (JSON/dict) with fields: query (string), summary (string), sections (list of {heading, content}), sources (list of {url, tool_used, title}), potential_biases (string), Optional UI rendering of report with source badges and expandable sections
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
@@ -1,36 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"name": "autonomous-web-research-agent",
|
|
||||||
"version": "1.0.0",
|
|
||||||
"goal": "Autonomously research a given query on the web using multiple search tools and generate a structured report with summary, detailed sections, source tracking, and bias analysis.",
|
|
||||||
"inputs": [
|
|
||||||
"query (string): the research question or topic to investigate",
|
|
||||||
"tools (list, optional): selected web search/tools to use (e.g., Tavily, Google, NewsAPI, DuckDuckGo)",
|
|
||||||
"api_keys (dict, optional): credentials for LLM and external search APIs",
|
|
||||||
"model_config (dict, optional): LLM provider and parameters"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"steps": [
|
|
||||||
"1. Accept user query and optional tool selections.",
|
|
||||||
"2. Initialize agent framework (e.g., LangGraph) with integrated tools: web search (Tavily, Google, DuckDuckGo), news API, web scraping.",
|
|
||||||
"3. Decompose query into sub-questions if needed and iteratively call tools to gather relevant information.",
|
|
||||||
"4. Extract and deduplicate content from retrieved sources, tracking source metadata (URL, tool used).",
|
|
||||||
"5. Use a large language model to synthesize findings into an executive summary and detailed sections.",
|
|
||||||
"6. Analyze potential biases or limitations of gathered sources.",
|
|
||||||
"7. Compile a structured report object (ResearchReport) containing query, summary, sections, sources, biases.",
|
|
||||||
"8. Optionally present report via a UI (e.g., Streamlit) or return as JSON."
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"outputs": [
|
|
||||||
"ResearchReport (JSON/dict) with fields: query (string), summary (string), sections (list of {heading, content}), sources (list of {url, tool_used, title}), potential_biases (string)",
|
|
||||||
"Optional UI rendering of report with source badges and expandable sections"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"failure_modes": [
|
|
||||||
"Missing or invalid API keys causing tool authentication failures",
|
|
||||||
"Rate limits or network errors from search APIs",
|
|
||||||
"Insufficient or low-quality search results leading to incomplete report",
|
|
||||||
"LLM hallucination or mis-summarization despite source tracking",
|
|
||||||
"Parsing errors in HTML/scraped content"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"confidence": 0.85,
|
|
||||||
"explanation": "The repository implements a generic autonomous web research agent that can be reused for any topical query. The workflow of querying, multi-tool retrieval, synthesis, and structured reporting is not domain-specific and can be extracted as a reusable skill.",
|
|
||||||
"source_repo": "https://github.com/DennisDRX/Faraday-Web-Researcher-Agent.git",
|
|
||||||
"score": 1.0
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
|
|||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
name: literature-review-with-traceable-ai-evidence
|
||||||
|
version: 1.0.0
|
||||||
|
description: Enable researchers to ingest documents, asynchronously index them, and
|
||||||
|
interact with multi-agent AI to answer questions with verifiable citations to original
|
||||||
|
text.
|
||||||
|
inputs:
|
||||||
|
- Documents in PDF, Office, image, or text formats
|
||||||
|
- Research questions or topics of interest
|
||||||
|
- 'Optional: user model configuration via .env or settings'
|
||||||
|
steps:
|
||||||
|
- Upload documents to a project (via desktop app or web UI)
|
||||||
|
- System asynchronously converts Office docs to PDF if needed, runs OCR to extract
|
||||||
|
text with coordinates, chunks and embeds into vector store
|
||||||
|
- User starts a main research session or creates exploration branches without waiting
|
||||||
|
for indexing to finish
|
||||||
|
- Leader agent receives query and delegates subtasks to researcher, reviewer, writer
|
||||||
|
subagents
|
||||||
|
- Subagents perform hybrid retrieval and rerank to find relevant chunks with source
|
||||||
|
coordinates
|
||||||
|
- Agents synthesize answers and return evidence with clickable citations that highlight
|
||||||
|
original pages
|
||||||
|
- User verifies conclusions by navigating to cited source locations and can save notes
|
||||||
|
to research memory or mind map
|
||||||
|
outputs:
|
||||||
|
- AI-generated answers with traceable evidence (coordinates, page highlights)
|
||||||
|
- Research session history with branches
|
||||||
|
- Indexed document library for future queries
|
||||||
|
- Mind maps or structured notes
|
||||||
|
- Persistent run events for resuming sessions
|
||||||
|
tags: []
|
||||||
|
metadata:
|
||||||
|
source_repo: https://github.com/0verL1nk/PaperSage.git
|
||||||
|
extracted_at: ''
|
||||||
|
confidence: 0.85
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# literature-review-with-traceable-ai-evidence
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Enable researchers to ingest documents, asynchronously index them, and interact with multi-agent AI to answer questions with verifiable citations to original text.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Steps
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. Upload documents to a project (via desktop app or web UI)
|
||||||
|
2. System asynchronously converts Office docs to PDF if needed, runs OCR to extract text with coordinates, chunks and embeds into vector store
|
||||||
|
3. User starts a main research session or creates exploration branches without waiting for indexing to finish
|
||||||
|
4. Leader agent receives query and delegates subtasks to researcher, reviewer, writer subagents
|
||||||
|
5. Subagents perform hybrid retrieval and rerank to find relevant chunks with source coordinates
|
||||||
|
6. Agents synthesize answers and return evidence with clickable citations that highlight original pages
|
||||||
|
7. User verifies conclusions by navigating to cited source locations and can save notes to research memory or mind map
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Inputs
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Documents in PDF, Office, image, or text formats
|
||||||
|
- Research questions or topics of interest
|
||||||
|
- Optional: user model configuration via .env or settings
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Outputs
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- AI-generated answers with traceable evidence (coordinates, page highlights)
|
||||||
|
- Research session history with branches
|
||||||
|
- Indexed document library for future queries
|
||||||
|
- Mind maps or structured notes
|
||||||
|
- Persistent run events for resuming sessions
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Failure Modes
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Missing local Office/LibreOffice converter causes document conversion failure
|
||||||
|
- First-time model download may be slow or require network
|
||||||
|
- OCR may have low confidence on poor quality scans
|
||||||
|
- Retrieval might miss context if chunking splits semantics
|
||||||
|
- Multi-agent coordination could produce conflicting intermediate results
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Source
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Extracted from: [https://github.com/0verL1nk/PaperSage.git](https://github.com/0verL1nk/PaperSage.git)
|
||||||
|
Confidence: 0.85
|
||||||
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
|
|||||||
|
# Commands: literature-review-with-traceable-ai-evidence
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Available Commands
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- `/skill literature-review-with-traceable-ai-evidence` — Load this skill
|
||||||
|
- `/run literature-review-with-traceable-ai-evidence` — Execute workflow
|
||||||
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
|||||||
|
# Examples: literature-review-with-traceable-ai-evidence
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Usage Example
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```python
|
||||||
|
# How to use this skill
|
||||||
|
# Inputs: Documents in PDF, Office, image, or text formats, Research questions or topics of interest, Optional: user model configuration via .env or settings
|
||||||
|
# Process: Upload documents to a project (via desktop app or web UI) → System asynchronously converts Office docs to PDF if needed, runs OCR to extract text with coordinates, chunks and embeds into vector store → User starts a main research session or creates exploration branches without waiting for indexing to finish
|
||||||
|
# Outputs: AI-generated answers with traceable evidence (coordinates, page highlights), Research session history with branches, Indexed document library for future queries, Mind maps or structured notes, Persistent run events for resuming sessions
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
|
|||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
"name": "literature-review-with-traceable-ai-evidence",
|
||||||
|
"version": "1.0.0",
|
||||||
|
"goal": "Enable researchers to ingest documents, asynchronously index them, and interact with multi-agent AI to answer questions with verifiable citations to original text.",
|
||||||
|
"inputs": [
|
||||||
|
"Documents in PDF, Office, image, or text formats",
|
||||||
|
"Research questions or topics of interest",
|
||||||
|
"Optional: user model configuration via .env or settings"
|
||||||
|
],
|
||||||
|
"steps": [
|
||||||
|
"Upload documents to a project (via desktop app or web UI)",
|
||||||
|
"System asynchronously converts Office docs to PDF if needed, runs OCR to extract text with coordinates, chunks and embeds into vector store",
|
||||||
|
"User starts a main research session or creates exploration branches without waiting for indexing to finish",
|
||||||
|
"Leader agent receives query and delegates subtasks to researcher, reviewer, writer subagents",
|
||||||
|
"Subagents perform hybrid retrieval and rerank to find relevant chunks with source coordinates",
|
||||||
|
"Agents synthesize answers and return evidence with clickable citations that highlight original pages",
|
||||||
|
"User verifies conclusions by navigating to cited source locations and can save notes to research memory or mind map"
|
||||||
|
],
|
||||||
|
"outputs": [
|
||||||
|
"AI-generated answers with traceable evidence (coordinates, page highlights)",
|
||||||
|
"Research session history with branches",
|
||||||
|
"Indexed document library for future queries",
|
||||||
|
"Mind maps or structured notes",
|
||||||
|
"Persistent run events for resuming sessions"
|
||||||
|
],
|
||||||
|
"failure_modes": [
|
||||||
|
"Missing local Office/LibreOffice converter causes document conversion failure",
|
||||||
|
"First-time model download may be slow or require network",
|
||||||
|
"OCR may have low confidence on poor quality scans",
|
||||||
|
"Retrieval might miss context if chunking splits semantics",
|
||||||
|
"Multi-agent coordination could produce conflicting intermediate results"
|
||||||
|
],
|
||||||
|
"confidence": 0.85,
|
||||||
|
"explanation": "The README describes PaperSage's core workflow: asynchronous document ingestion with OCR/indexing, followed by multi-agent question answering with cited evidence. This process is not tied to the specific codebase and can be reused as a general literature review methodology for any document-centric research using RAG and agent collaboration.",
|
||||||
|
"source_repo": "https://github.com/0verL1nk/PaperSage.git",
|
||||||
|
"score": 1.0
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
+1
-1
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
|||||||
# Tests: autonomous-web-research-agent
|
# Tests: literature-review-with-traceable-ai-evidence
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Test Checklist
|
## Test Checklist
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user