Compare commits
1 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 179babea68 |
@@ -1,77 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
---
|
|
||||||
name: autonomous-web-research-agent
|
|
||||||
version: 1.0.0
|
|
||||||
description: Autonomously research a given query on the web using multiple search
|
|
||||||
tools and generate a structured report with summary, detailed sections, source tracking,
|
|
||||||
and bias analysis.
|
|
||||||
inputs:
|
|
||||||
- 'query (string): the research question or topic to investigate'
|
|
||||||
- 'tools (list, optional): selected web search/tools to use (e.g., Tavily, Google,
|
|
||||||
NewsAPI, DuckDuckGo)'
|
|
||||||
- 'api_keys (dict, optional): credentials for LLM and external search APIs'
|
|
||||||
- 'model_config (dict, optional): LLM provider and parameters'
|
|
||||||
steps:
|
|
||||||
- 1. Accept user query and optional tool selections.
|
|
||||||
- '2. Initialize agent framework (e.g., LangGraph) with integrated tools: web search
|
|
||||||
(Tavily, Google, DuckDuckGo), news API, web scraping.'
|
|
||||||
- 3. Decompose query into sub-questions if needed and iteratively call tools to gather
|
|
||||||
relevant information.
|
|
||||||
- 4. Extract and deduplicate content from retrieved sources, tracking source metadata
|
|
||||||
(URL, tool used).
|
|
||||||
- 5. Use a large language model to synthesize findings into an executive summary and
|
|
||||||
detailed sections.
|
|
||||||
- 6. Analyze potential biases or limitations of gathered sources.
|
|
||||||
- 7. Compile a structured report object (ResearchReport) containing query, summary,
|
|
||||||
sections, sources, biases.
|
|
||||||
- 8. Optionally present report via a UI (e.g., Streamlit) or return as JSON.
|
|
||||||
outputs:
|
|
||||||
- 'ResearchReport (JSON/dict) with fields: query (string), summary (string), sections
|
|
||||||
(list of {heading, content}), sources (list of {url, tool_used, title}), potential_biases
|
|
||||||
(string)'
|
|
||||||
- Optional UI rendering of report with source badges and expandable sections
|
|
||||||
tags: []
|
|
||||||
metadata:
|
|
||||||
source_repo: https://github.com/DennisDRX/Faraday-Web-Researcher-Agent.git
|
|
||||||
extracted_at: ''
|
|
||||||
confidence: 0.85
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# autonomous-web-research-agent
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Autonomously research a given query on the web using multiple search tools and generate a structured report with summary, detailed sections, source tracking, and bias analysis.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Steps
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
1. 1. Accept user query and optional tool selections.
|
|
||||||
2. 2. Initialize agent framework (e.g., LangGraph) with integrated tools: web search (Tavily, Google, DuckDuckGo), news API, web scraping.
|
|
||||||
3. 3. Decompose query into sub-questions if needed and iteratively call tools to gather relevant information.
|
|
||||||
4. 4. Extract and deduplicate content from retrieved sources, tracking source metadata (URL, tool used).
|
|
||||||
5. 5. Use a large language model to synthesize findings into an executive summary and detailed sections.
|
|
||||||
6. 6. Analyze potential biases or limitations of gathered sources.
|
|
||||||
7. 7. Compile a structured report object (ResearchReport) containing query, summary, sections, sources, biases.
|
|
||||||
8. 8. Optionally present report via a UI (e.g., Streamlit) or return as JSON.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Inputs
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- query (string): the research question or topic to investigate
|
|
||||||
- tools (list, optional): selected web search/tools to use (e.g., Tavily, Google, NewsAPI, DuckDuckGo)
|
|
||||||
- api_keys (dict, optional): credentials for LLM and external search APIs
|
|
||||||
- model_config (dict, optional): LLM provider and parameters
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Outputs
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- ResearchReport (JSON/dict) with fields: query (string), summary (string), sections (list of {heading, content}), sources (list of {url, tool_used, title}), potential_biases (string)
|
|
||||||
- Optional UI rendering of report with source badges and expandable sections
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Failure Modes
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- Missing or invalid API keys causing tool authentication failures
|
|
||||||
- Rate limits or network errors from search APIs
|
|
||||||
- Insufficient or low-quality search results leading to incomplete report
|
|
||||||
- LLM hallucination or mis-summarization despite source tracking
|
|
||||||
- Parsing errors in HTML/scraped content
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Source
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Extracted from: [https://github.com/DennisDRX/Faraday-Web-Researcher-Agent.git](https://github.com/DennisDRX/Faraday-Web-Researcher-Agent.git)
|
|
||||||
Confidence: 0.85
|
|
||||||
@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Commands: autonomous-web-research-agent
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Available Commands
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- `/skill autonomous-web-research-agent` — Load this skill
|
|
||||||
- `/run autonomous-web-research-agent` — Execute workflow
|
|
||||||
@@ -1,10 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Examples: autonomous-web-research-agent
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Usage Example
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```python
|
|
||||||
# How to use this skill
|
|
||||||
# Inputs: query (string): the research question or topic to investigate, tools (list, optional): selected web search/tools to use (e.g., Tavily, Google, NewsAPI, DuckDuckGo), api_keys (dict, optional): credentials for LLM and external search APIs, model_config (dict, optional): LLM provider and parameters
|
|
||||||
# Process: 1. Accept user query and optional tool selections. → 2. Initialize agent framework (e.g., LangGraph) with integrated tools: web search (Tavily, Google, DuckDuckGo), news API, web scraping. → 3. Decompose query into sub-questions if needed and iteratively call tools to gather relevant information.
|
|
||||||
# Outputs: ResearchReport (JSON/dict) with fields: query (string), summary (string), sections (list of {heading, content}), sources (list of {url, tool_used, title}), potential_biases (string), Optional UI rendering of report with source badges and expandable sections
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
@@ -1,36 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"name": "autonomous-web-research-agent",
|
|
||||||
"version": "1.0.0",
|
|
||||||
"goal": "Autonomously research a given query on the web using multiple search tools and generate a structured report with summary, detailed sections, source tracking, and bias analysis.",
|
|
||||||
"inputs": [
|
|
||||||
"query (string): the research question or topic to investigate",
|
|
||||||
"tools (list, optional): selected web search/tools to use (e.g., Tavily, Google, NewsAPI, DuckDuckGo)",
|
|
||||||
"api_keys (dict, optional): credentials for LLM and external search APIs",
|
|
||||||
"model_config (dict, optional): LLM provider and parameters"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"steps": [
|
|
||||||
"1. Accept user query and optional tool selections.",
|
|
||||||
"2. Initialize agent framework (e.g., LangGraph) with integrated tools: web search (Tavily, Google, DuckDuckGo), news API, web scraping.",
|
|
||||||
"3. Decompose query into sub-questions if needed and iteratively call tools to gather relevant information.",
|
|
||||||
"4. Extract and deduplicate content from retrieved sources, tracking source metadata (URL, tool used).",
|
|
||||||
"5. Use a large language model to synthesize findings into an executive summary and detailed sections.",
|
|
||||||
"6. Analyze potential biases or limitations of gathered sources.",
|
|
||||||
"7. Compile a structured report object (ResearchReport) containing query, summary, sections, sources, biases.",
|
|
||||||
"8. Optionally present report via a UI (e.g., Streamlit) or return as JSON."
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"outputs": [
|
|
||||||
"ResearchReport (JSON/dict) with fields: query (string), summary (string), sections (list of {heading, content}), sources (list of {url, tool_used, title}), potential_biases (string)",
|
|
||||||
"Optional UI rendering of report with source badges and expandable sections"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"failure_modes": [
|
|
||||||
"Missing or invalid API keys causing tool authentication failures",
|
|
||||||
"Rate limits or network errors from search APIs",
|
|
||||||
"Insufficient or low-quality search results leading to incomplete report",
|
|
||||||
"LLM hallucination or mis-summarization despite source tracking",
|
|
||||||
"Parsing errors in HTML/scraped content"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"confidence": 0.85,
|
|
||||||
"explanation": "The repository implements a generic autonomous web research agent that can be reused for any topical query. The workflow of querying, multi-tool retrieval, synthesis, and structured reporting is not domain-specific and can be extracted as a reusable skill.",
|
|
||||||
"source_repo": "https://github.com/DennisDRX/Faraday-Web-Researcher-Agent.git",
|
|
||||||
"score": 1.0
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
|
|||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
name: conditional-review-workflow
|
||||||
|
version: 1.0.0
|
||||||
|
description: Process a user request through branching logic to approve or reject it,
|
||||||
|
producing a routed decision result
|
||||||
|
inputs:
|
||||||
|
- 'request: string - The user''s request or input collected at runtime via the input
|
||||||
|
agent'
|
||||||
|
steps:
|
||||||
|
- 'Start: Input agent collects the user request and stores it in the ''request'' state
|
||||||
|
field, then routes to Classify node'
|
||||||
|
- 'Classify: Branching agent evaluates the ''request'' field and routes to Approve
|
||||||
|
node on success or Reject node on failure (on_failure)'
|
||||||
|
- 'Approve: Default agent formats an approval message using the request and stores
|
||||||
|
it in the ''result'' output field'
|
||||||
|
- 'Reject: Default agent formats a rejection message using the request and stores
|
||||||
|
it in the ''result'' output field'
|
||||||
|
outputs:
|
||||||
|
- 'result: string - Final message indicating whether the request was approved or rejected,
|
||||||
|
containing the original request'
|
||||||
|
tags: []
|
||||||
|
metadata:
|
||||||
|
source_repo: https://github.com/jwwelbor/AgentMap.git
|
||||||
|
extracted_at: ''
|
||||||
|
confidence: 0.85
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# conditional-review-workflow
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Process a user request through branching logic to approve or reject it, producing a routed decision result
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Steps
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. Start: Input agent collects the user request and stores it in the 'request' state field, then routes to Classify node
|
||||||
|
2. Classify: Branching agent evaluates the 'request' field and routes to Approve node on success or Reject node on failure (on_failure)
|
||||||
|
3. Approve: Default agent formats an approval message using the request and stores it in the 'result' output field
|
||||||
|
4. Reject: Default agent formats a rejection message using the request and stores it in the 'result' output field
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Inputs
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- request: string - The user's request or input collected at runtime via the input agent
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Outputs
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- result: string - Final message indicating whether the request was approved or rejected, containing the original request
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Failure Modes
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Input collection failure - user provides no or invalid input (no explicit on_failure defined for Start node in example)
|
||||||
|
- Branching classification failure - if branching agent cannot evaluate, it routes to Reject via on_failure configuration
|
||||||
|
- LLM provider unavailability - if branching or agents rely on LLM backends that are misconfigured or offline
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Source
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Extracted from: [https://github.com/jwwelbor/AgentMap.git](https://github.com/jwwelbor/AgentMap.git)
|
||||||
|
Confidence: 0.85
|
||||||
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
|
|||||||
|
# Commands: conditional-review-workflow
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Available Commands
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- `/skill conditional-review-workflow` — Load this skill
|
||||||
|
- `/run conditional-review-workflow` — Execute workflow
|
||||||
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
|||||||
|
# Examples: conditional-review-workflow
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Usage Example
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```python
|
||||||
|
# How to use this skill
|
||||||
|
# Inputs: request: string - The user's request or input collected at runtime via the input agent
|
||||||
|
# Process: Start: Input agent collects the user request and stores it in the 'request' state field, then routes to Classify node → Classify: Branching agent evaluates the 'request' field and routes to Approve node on success or Reject node on failure (on_failure) → Approve: Default agent formats an approval message using the request and stores it in the 'result' output field
|
||||||
|
# Outputs: result: string - Final message indicating whether the request was approved or rejected, containing the original request
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
|
|||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
"name": "conditional-review-workflow",
|
||||||
|
"version": "1.0.0",
|
||||||
|
"goal": "Process a user request through branching logic to approve or reject it, producing a routed decision result",
|
||||||
|
"inputs": [
|
||||||
|
"request: string - The user's request or input collected at runtime via the input agent"
|
||||||
|
],
|
||||||
|
"steps": [
|
||||||
|
"Start: Input agent collects the user request and stores it in the 'request' state field, then routes to Classify node",
|
||||||
|
"Classify: Branching agent evaluates the 'request' field and routes to Approve node on success or Reject node on failure (on_failure)",
|
||||||
|
"Approve: Default agent formats an approval message using the request and stores it in the 'result' output field",
|
||||||
|
"Reject: Default agent formats a rejection message using the request and stores it in the 'result' output field"
|
||||||
|
],
|
||||||
|
"outputs": [
|
||||||
|
"result: string - Final message indicating whether the request was approved or rejected, containing the original request"
|
||||||
|
],
|
||||||
|
"failure_modes": [
|
||||||
|
"Input collection failure - user provides no or invalid input (no explicit on_failure defined for Start node in example)",
|
||||||
|
"Branching classification failure - if branching agent cannot evaluate, it routes to Reject via on_failure configuration",
|
||||||
|
"LLM provider unavailability - if branching or agents rely on LLM backends that are misconfigured or offline"
|
||||||
|
],
|
||||||
|
"confidence": 0.85,
|
||||||
|
"explanation": "Extracted from AgentMap's documented CSV workflow example (ReviewFlow). This is a reusable conditional routing pattern that can be adapted for any approval/rejection, triage, or binary-decision scenario by modifying the branching prompt and agent types. The CSV-based declarative format makes it portable across the AgentMap framework.",
|
||||||
|
"source_repo": "https://github.com/jwwelbor/AgentMap.git",
|
||||||
|
"score": 1.0
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
+1
-1
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
|||||||
# Tests: autonomous-web-research-agent
|
# Tests: conditional-review-workflow
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Test Checklist
|
## Test Checklist
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user