# geolocal.io — Business Plan (working draft) **Branch:** `planning-rev2` **Status:** In progress — conversation checkpoint, not final **Purpose:** One durable place for the clean plan. Existing docs on `main` are raw material; this file is what we iterate. **How we work this file** - Checkpoint here after every few solid decisions (or when a phrase must not be lost). - Prefer revising this over spawning parallel strategy docs. - Mark unknowns as open questions. Do not invent market numbers here. --- ## 1. North star (wording still open) **Intent (stable):** Enable local businesses to be discovered and recommended by AI assistants. Still wordsmithing the exact sentence. The job does not change while the phrasing does. --- ## 2. What the company is Infrastructure — not a consumer destination. - Host structured business truth so AI assistants can discover, understand, and recommend local businesses (services and local retail with real-world presence). - Give the business a simple way to point at that truth (no servers for them to run). - Orchestrate booking / payment / related partners where needed; do not rebuild Calendly or Shopify. - Stay invisible to end consumers; win by being useful to agents and trustworthy to owners. **Not:** another Yelp/Google for human browsing attention. --- ## 3. Who we serve **Primary customer:** the business owner. By extension: - Someone in their organization acting for them - A partner they already trust (agency, SEO, chamber, tourism board) Partners are a **path to the owner**, not a different product. --- ## 4. How demand shows up (two moments) 1. **Presence for other AIs** — When a consumer’s assistant asks for a local plumber / salon / store, structured geolocal data can be consulted and acted on. 2. **Owner (or their AI) asks for help** — Emerging path: “How do we help our business be discovered by AI?” Geolocal should invest in scenarios where the owner’s own AI can diagnose and set that up — not only human sales through agencies. Same north star; different moments of truth. --- ## 5. Wedge and flywheel (direction agreed) **Preferred wedge:** a free AI-visibility checkup. Why: - Shows immediate value / need - Builds critical mass - Small free actions amplify adoption **Long-term reputation bet:** become so useful and dense that AI systems default to checking geolocal for local-class queries — analogous to how they lean on Yelp or Foursquare today. **Strategic read (not pricing gimmick):** free usefulness → coverage → agent trust → more local queries resolved via geolocal → more owners want in → denser graph. ### Open — first free win after checkup Unresolved on purpose (checkpoint before answering): - **A.** Free checkup *plus* a small durable win (e.g. basic presence live, structured hours, minimal genre pack) - **B.** Diagnosis only, with a clear line on what paid unlocks Lean toward **A** if the goal is critical mass and “AI knows to check geolocal,” because empty scores do not densify the graph. Final call: Ty. --- ## 6. Business plan audience (still open) Clarify what this document must optimize for first: - Internal clarity (founders / operators) - Investors - Partners / channels Can serve more than one later; pick the primary reader for v1 structure. --- ## 7. Source material (do not duplicate blindly) Treat as inputs, not competing sources of truth while this draft is live: - `NORTH_STAR.md` - `docs/strategy/CANONICAL_STRATEGY.md` - `docs/gtm/`, `docs/investors/`, `docs/product/` - `docs/archive/` — historical only If something here conflicts with `CANONICAL_STRATEGY.md`, resolve on purpose in a later pass — do not silently fork forever. --- ## 8. Checkpoint log | When | What landed | | :--- | :--- | | 2026-09-15 | North star intent; owner-first buyer; partners as extension; agent-mediated “get discovered” path; free checkup wedge; reputation / critical-mass flywheel; open question on free durable win vs diagnosis-only | --- ## Next conversation topics 1. Decide free win after checkup (A vs B above) 2. Primary reader for v1 of this plan 3. Offer / packaging (free vs paid) without inventing numbers 4. 90-day proof: what “reputable enough that AI checks us” requires in coverage and quality