Ty_Tech/SlabUploader
6
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 15 Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

docs: unslop PM-DESIGN-ALIGNMENT for human review

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
grokbot_ty
2026-09-01 04:13:47 +00:00
parent 6e918db3a5
commit e1e087b736
1 changed files with 252 additions and 247 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
docs/PM-DESIGN-ALIGNMENT.md
+252 -247
View File
@@ -1,360 +1,365 @@
# SlabUploader — PM requirements ↔ design alignment report
# SlabUploader: PM vs design alignment
Status: WORKSPACE ONLY · 2026-08-31 PT · **do not commit/push** (Ty HOLD on gitea writes)
Authors: Principal PM (product alignment §§1–9 + matrix) · Dev Manager (technical consistency / landmines)
Baseline commits on gitea-atd `main`: `457711b` (AGENTS + Phase 0), `4ec478f` (PRD/README/Woo/DEPLOYMENT patches)
Also compared: `/workspace/slabuploader-poc-review-package.md` §§1–2 (env-agnostic §3 draft not on gitea)
**Status:** On gitea-atd for Ty review. 2026-08-31 PT. Human rewrite (unslop). Other doc patches still on HOLD.
**Authors:** Principal PM (product alignment). Dev Manager (technical landmines).
**Baseline on gitea-atd `main`:** `457711b` (AGENTS + Phase 0). `4ec478f` (PRD/README/Woo/DEPLOYMENT patches).
**Also compared:** `/workspace/slabuploader-poc-review-package.md` sections 1-2. Env-agnostic section 3 draft is not on gitea.
---
## How to read
## How to read this
| Label | Meaning |
|---|---|
| **Agreed** | Review package intent, AGENTS, and design specs (TECH-SPEC / ARCHITECTURE / landed patches) say the same thing |
| **Conflict** | Two or more live SoT docs disagree; coding agents can pick the wrong one |
| **Missing** | Required clarity absent, or only lives in `/workspace` drafts not on gitea |
| **Agreed** | Review package, AGENTS, and the design specs say the same thing |
| **Conflict** | Live docs disagree. A coding agent can pick the wrong one. |
| **Missing** | Clarity is absent, or it only lives in a `/workspace` draft not on gitea |
---
## 1. POC outcome & Woo firebreak
## 1. POC outcome and Woo safety
| | |
|---|---|
| **Agreed** | Phone → customer-ready listing on **www.whidbeywoodstore.com**. UAT on PROD as **Woo draft** + **`SLAB-UAT-*`** (forced draft). Final POC = one real SKU → **Woo publish** after Ty review. Settings field **`woo_create_status`**: `draft | publish`, default `draft`. Landed in AGENTS §5, PRD decisions 12/FR36 (4ec478f), CONTENT-WOO, DATA-MODEL, OPENAPI, DEPLOYMENT smoke, review package §1. |
| **Conflict** | None material on the firebreak itself after 4ec478f. |
| **Missing** | Env-agnostic deploy wording still only in `/workspace` package §3 — not on gitea (HOLD). Does not block Woo alignment. |
**Agreed.** End goal: phone photo becomes a customer-ready listing on www.whidbeywoodstore.com.
Woo safety works like this. Test products are created as drafts with SKU prefix `SLAB-UAT-*`, so customers never see them until Ty intentionally publishes a real SKU. Settings field `woo_create_status` is `draft` or `publish`, default `draft`. Final POC is one real SKU published after Ty review.
This is locked in AGENTS section 5, PRD decisions 12/FR36 (`4ec478f`), CONTENT-WOO, DATA-MODEL, OPENAPI, DEPLOYMENT smoke, and review package section 1.
**Conflict.** None material on Woo safety after `4ec478f`.
**Missing.** Env-agnostic deploy wording still only in `/workspace` package section 3, not on gitea (HOLD). Does not block Woo alignment.
---
## 2. Hybrid vs server pipeline
## 2. Phone does the math, server stores it
| | |
|---|---|
| **Agreed** | ARCHITECTURE + TECH-SPEC + AGENTS §1 + IMPL-PLAN Phase 0 (457711b) + README + PRD stack/calibration rewrite (4ec478f): **client** owns mask/sliders/axis/sqft/bdft/3:4 PNG; **server** stores, U2Net on demand, Woo, inference proxy. Server must not recompute happy-path math as SoT. |
| **Conflict** | **IMPL-PLAN Phases 1+** still carry stale offline/OCR/ruler/`pending`/`processing→ready` language (banners say ignore). OPENAPI PUT still says server re-runs derived math (see Dev Manager B1). |
| **Missing** | Full rewrite of IMPL-PLAN Phases 1–6 to hybrid + Woo draft UAT. |
**Agreed.** The phone (client) owns mask, sliders, axis, sqft, bdft, and the 3:4 PNG. The server stores those numbers, runs U2Net on demand, talks to Woo, and proxies inference. The server must not recompute happy-path math as the source of truth.
Locked in ARCHITECTURE, TECH-SPEC, AGENTS section 1, IMPL-PLAN Phase 0 (`457711b`), README, and the PRD stack rewrite (`4ec478f`).
**Conflict.** IMPL-PLAN Phases 1+ still carry stale offline/OCR/ruler and `processing` to `ready` language. Banners say ignore those sections, but agents skim past banners. OPENAPI PUT still says the server re-runs derived math (see blocker B1 below).
**Missing.** Full rewrite of IMPL-PLAN Phases 1 to 6 for hybrid plus Woo draft UAT.
---
## 3. bdft formula
## 3. Board-foot formula
| | |
|---|---|
| **Agreed** | TECH-SPEC: `bdft = sqft × thickness_in` (TV-3). AGENTS, IMPL-PLAN Phase 0, PRD FR4 (patched), DEPLOYMENT smoke. |
| **Conflict** | None on formula after 4ec478f. CONTENT-WOO `length_ft = floor(length_in / 12)` is **display conversion**, not bdft. |
| **Missing** | — |
**Agreed.** `bdft = sqft x thickness_in` (TECH-SPEC TV-3). Same in AGENTS, IMPL-PLAN Phase 0, PRD FR4, DEPLOYMENT smoke.
**Conflict.** None after `4ec478f`. CONTENT-WOO `length_ft = floor(length_in / 12)` is display conversion only, not bdft math.
**Missing.** None.
---
## 4. Image prep (3:4, 1600, sliders)
| | |
|---|---|
| **Agreed** | TECH-SPEC §§3–5: sheet/sliders, mask confirm, 3:4 PNG, 80% fill, ≥1600 or retake, no fake upscale. AGENTS + ARCHITECTURE + review package §2 match. |
| **Conflict** | Narrow: PRD FR19 still “species **and wood category**” pricing while TECH-SPEC/DATA-MODEL = **species-only** $/bdft. CONTENT-WOO media “JPEG” vs TECH-SPEC transparent PNG (Dev Manager W4). |
| **Missing** | Explicit “wood category for taxonomy, not for $/bdft in POC” in PRD when writes reopen. |
**Agreed.** Sheet and sliders, mask confirm, 3:4 PNG, 80% fill, at least 1600px or retake, no fake upscale. TECH-SPEC sections 3 to 5, AGENTS, ARCHITECTURE, and review package section 2 match.
**Conflict (narrow).** PRD FR19 still prices by "species and wood category." TECH-SPEC and DATA-MODEL price by species only ($/bdft). CONTENT-WOO still says media upload is JPEG. TECH-SPEC wants transparent PNG (warn W4).
**Missing.** Explicit line in PRD when writes reopen: wood category is for taxonomy, not for $/bdft in the POC.
---
## 5. Secrets location
## 5. Where secrets live
| | |
|---|---|
| **Agreed** | ARCHITECTURE + AGENTS §4 + PRD D15 (patched) + DATA-MODEL: Woo + inference secrets **server AES-GCM**; `SLAB_AES_KEY` env only; never browser. |
| **Conflict** | Soft: DATA-MODEL/OPENAPI still list sheet/slider prefs in server settings while ARCHITECTURE/AGENTS say localStorage (Dev Manager W3). |
| **Missing** | — |
**Agreed.** Woo and inference secrets sit on the server under AES-GCM. `SLAB_AES_KEY` is env only. Never in the browser. ARCHITECTURE, AGENTS section 4, PRD D15, DATA-MODEL.
**Conflict (soft).** DATA-MODEL and OPENAPI still list sheet/slider prefs in server settings. ARCHITECTURE and AGENTS say localStorage (warn W3).
**Missing.** None.
---
## 6. Inference OFF-first, then Call 1/2
## 6. Inference stays OFF until first draft listing works
| | |
|---|---|
| **Agreed** | Review package + AGENTS §6 + ARCHITECTURE + PROMPTS + Phase 0 out-of-scope: suite passes OFF; **Gate C** = OFF + manual + Woo draft; **Call 1/2 after Gate C**, still inside POC; Call 2 user-triggered; LoRA deferred; no LLM dimensions. |
| **Conflict** | None on sequencing intent. |
| **Missing** | Phase 5 rewrite later for “all photos @1024” vs older “top-down only” flavor if any remains. |
**Agreed.** The test suite must pass with inference OFF. First draft listing (Gate C) means inference OFF, manual path, and Woo draft. Call 1 and Call 2 come after that, still inside the POC. Call 2 is user-triggered. LoRA is deferred. No LLM dimensions.
Review package, AGENTS section 6, ARCHITECTURE, PROMPTS, Phase 0 out-of-scope.
**Conflict.** None on sequencing intent.
**Missing.** Phase 5 rewrite later if any "top-down only" flavor remains versus "all photos @1024."
---
## 7. Slab lifecycle vs `woo_create_status`
## 7. Slab status vs Woo create status
| | |
|---|---|
| **Agreed** | Slab: `draft → calibrated → ready → publishing → published|failed`. Woo: **`woo_create_status`** `draft | publish`. Explicit do-not-conflate in AGENTS/CONTENT-WOO. Slab `published` ≠ storefront live when create was Woo draft. |
| **Conflict** | Soft word overload on “published.” OPENAPI POST “calibrated draft” returning `status: draft` (Dev Manager W1). |
| **Missing** | Optional glossary row when writes reopen. |
**Agreed.** Slab lifecycle: `draft` to `calibrated` to `ready` to `publishing` to `published` or `failed`. Woo create status: `draft` or `publish`. Do not conflate them. A slab can show `published` while the storefront still only has a Woo draft. AGENTS and CONTENT-WOO say this explicitly.
**Conflict (soft).** The word "published" is overloaded. OPENAPI POST creates a "calibrated draft" but returns `status: draft` (warn W1).
**Missing.** Optional glossary row when writes reopen.
---
## 8. Online-only
## 8. Online only
| | |
|---|---|
| **Agreed** | Review package + AGENTS + README (4ec478f) + PRD decision 18 + TECH-SPEC. Phase 0 excludes offline PWA. |
| **Conflict** | IMPL-PLAN Phase 2 / Phase 6 still specify offline capture (superseded banners — agents may skim past). |
| **Missing** | Phase 2/6 body rewrite when writes reopen. |
**Agreed.** No offline PWA in the POC. Review package, AGENTS, README (`4ec478f`), PRD decision 18, TECH-SPEC, Phase 0.
**Conflict.** IMPL-PLAN Phase 2 and Phase 6 still specify offline capture. Superseded banners exist. Agents may skim past them.
**Missing.** Phase 2/6 body rewrite when writes reopen.
---
## 9. Phase / Gate sequencing
## 9. Phase and gate map
| | |
|---|---|
| **Agreed** | Phase 0–6 retained. **Phase 0 = Gates A+B.** **Gate C = early Phase 1.** Inference after Gate C. |
| **Conflict** | Gate A raced onto gitea while Ty HOLDed further writes and asked env-agnostic + this alignment. Deploy host hard-coding still in AGENTS §9 / DEPLOYMENT / PRD FR42 (B2/B5). |
| **Missing** | Ty sign via CoS on env-agnostic deploy amend before Gate B. Coding agents / inventory held. |
Human names for the gates:
| Label | Human name | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Gate A | Docs freeze | Product locks written into the repo |
| Gate B | Run-host setup | Inventory the real host, deploy skeleton |
| Gate C | First draft listing | One Woo draft listing with inference OFF |
**Agreed.** Phases 0 to 6 stay. Phase 0 covers docs freeze and run-host setup. First draft listing is early Phase 1. Inference starts after first draft listing.
**Conflict.** Docs freeze raced onto gitea while Ty HOLDed further writes and asked for env-agnostic deploy plus this alignment. Deploy docs still hard-code `.201` in AGENTS section 9, DEPLOYMENT, and PRD FR42 (blockers B2/B5).
**Missing.** Ty sign-off via CoS on the env-agnostic deploy amend before run-host setup. Coding agents and inventory are held.
---
## Matrix (quick)
## Matrix
| Topic | Status |
|---|---|
| POC outcome & Woo firebreak | **Agreed** (on gitea) |
| Hybrid vs server pipeline | **Agreed** core; **Conflict** residual Phase 1+ / OPENAPI PUT |
| bdft formula | **Agreed** |
| Image prep | **Agreed**; narrow pricing/PNG conflicts |
| Secrets location | **Agreed**; soft prefs storage drift |
| Inference OFF → Call 1/2 | **Agreed** |
| Slab lifecycle vs woo_create_status | **Agreed** (wording overload residual) |
| Online-only | **Agreed**; Phase 2/6 text stale |
| Phase/Gate sequencing | **Agreed** map; **Missing** env-agnostic sign before Gate B |
| POC outcome and Woo safety | Agreed (on gitea) |
| Phone math vs server store | Agreed core. Conflict in Phase 1+ / OPENAPI PUT. |
| bdft formula | Agreed |
| Image prep | Agreed. Narrow pricing/PNG conflicts. |
| Secrets location | Agreed. Soft prefs storage drift. |
| Inference OFF then Call 1/2 | Agreed |
| Slab lifecycle vs woo_create_status | Agreed. Wording overload residual. |
| Online only | Agreed. Phase 2/6 text stale. |
| Phase / gate sequencing | Map agreed. Missing env-agnostic sign before run-host setup. |
---
## Principal PM conclusion
## PM take
Core product intent and design SoT (**TECH-SPEC, ARCHITECTURE, AGENTS, Phase 0, Woo firebreak**) **align** after `457711b`/`4ec478f`. Remaining risk is **implementer landmines** (OPENAPI recompute, hard-coded host, stale IMPL-PLAN bodies) — not a PM↔architecture split.
Core product intent and the design source of truth (TECH-SPEC, ARCHITECTURE, AGENTS, Phase 0, Woo safety) align after `457711b` and `4ec478f`. What is left is implementer landmines, not a PM vs architecture fight. OPENAPI still tells the server to recompute math. Deploy docs hard-code a host. IMPL-PLAN bodies still describe the old offline pipeline.
**Recommend via CoS:** when HOLD lifts, authorize one small docs commit for **env-agnostic deploy + OPENAPI “no server recompute SoT”** before any coding agents or Gate B; optional IMPL-PLAN 1+/2/6 and PRD FR19 cleanup in the same or follow-on commit.
**Recommend via CoS:** when HOLD lifts, authorize one small docs commit for env-agnostic deploy plus OPENAPI "no server recompute" before any coding agents or run-host setup. Optional IMPL-PLAN 1+/2/6 and PRD FR19 cleanup in the same or a follow-on commit.
---
## Dev Manager — technical consistency (full audit)
## Technical consistency audit
# SlabUploader PM↔design alignment — technical consistency
**Status:** Workspace-only audit (HOLD). No gitea commit/push/SSH performed.
**Authors:** Dev Manager (executor) · for CoS / Principal PM
**Repo HEAD:** `4ec478f` on `main` (`Ty_Tech/SlabUploader` @ gitea-atd)
**Audit date:** 2026-08-31 PT
**HOLD note:** Do **not** write to gitea until CoS lifts HOLD. Fixes below are **recommended workspace drafts only** — this report does not edit the repo. Env-agnostic deploy amend remains unsigned (see `/workspace/slabuploader-poc-review-package.md` §3 / `/workspace/slabuploader-env-agnostic-doc-outline.md`).
**Status:** Workspace-only. No gitea commit, push, or SSH.
**Authors:** Dev Manager, for CoS / Principal PM.
**Repo HEAD:** `4ec478f` on `main` (`Ty_Tech/SlabUploader` @ gitea-atd).
**Audit date:** 2026-08-31 PT.
**HOLD:** Do not write to gitea until CoS lifts HOLD. Fixes below are recommended drafts only. Env-agnostic deploy amend remains unsigned. See `/workspace/slabuploader-poc-review-package.md` section 3 and `/workspace/slabuploader-env-agnostic-doc-outline.md`.
---
## 1. What Gate A actually locked in repo (SHAs + files)
### What the docs freeze locked in (SHAs + files)
```
git log -5 --oneline
4ec478f docs: finish Gate A contradiction patches
457711b docs: Gate A freeze — AGENTS.md + hybrid Phase 0
457711b docs: Gate A freeze - AGENTS.md + hybrid Phase 0
a94d81d docs: set gitea-atd Ty_Tech/SlabUploader as remotes SoT
4d9f307 docs: lock inference review — prompts, Call 1/2, feat tags
4d9f307 docs: lock inference review - prompts, Call 1/2, feat tags
4e97770 docs: lock revised capture pipeline and hybrid architecture
```
| SHA | Commit | Files locked |
|---|---|---|
| **`457711b`** | Gate A freeze — AGENTS.md + hybrid Phase 0 | `AGENTS.md` (new, 148 lines); `docs/IMPL-PLAN.md` Phase 0 rewrite (+ banner that Phases 1+ are still stale) |
| **`4ec478f`** | Finish Gate A contradiction patches | `README.md`, `Slab capture app PRD.txt`, `docs/CONTENT-WOO.md`, `docs/DATA-MODEL.md`, `docs/DEPLOYMENT.md`, `docs/OPENAPI.md` |
| `457711b` | Docs freeze: AGENTS.md + hybrid Phase 0 | `AGENTS.md` (new, 148 lines). `docs/IMPL-PLAN.md` Phase 0 rewrite, plus banner that Phases 1+ are still stale. |
| `4ec478f` | Finish docs-freeze contradiction patches | `README.md`, `Slab capture app PRD.txt`, `docs/CONTENT-WOO.md`, `docs/DATA-MODEL.md`, `docs/DEPLOYMENT.md`, `docs/OPENAPI.md` |
**Already consistent before Gate A (not rewritten in those SHAs, but SoT per AGENTS precedence):**
- `docs/TECH-SPEC-PIPELINE.md` — client-authoritative math, `bdft = sqft × thickness_in`, TV-1…**TV-10**, no `/12`
- `docs/ARCHITECTURE.md` — hybrid topology, AES-GCM secrets, slab status machine
- `docs/PROMPTS.md` — Call 1/2 (not re-audited deeply; no Gate A delta)
Already consistent before the freeze (not rewritten in those SHAs, but source of truth per AGENTS precedence):
**Gate A product locks now in-repo (via AGENTS + patches):**
- Hybrid: client = happy-path measure/crop SoT; server = store / on-demand U2Net / Woo / inference proxy
- `bdft = sqft × thickness_in` (no `/12`)
- Secrets: server AES-GCM only; never browser
- Online-only POC (offline/OCR/ruler deferred)
- `woo_create_status` = `draft | publish`, default `draft`; `SLAB-UAT-*` force Woo draft on PROD
- `docs/TECH-SPEC-PIPELINE.md`: client-authoritative math, `bdft = sqft x thickness_in`, TV-1 through TV-10, no `/12`
- `docs/ARCHITECTURE.md`: hybrid topology, AES-GCM secrets, slab status machine
- `docs/PROMPTS.md`: Call 1/2 (no freeze delta)
Product locks now in-repo via AGENTS + patches:
- Hybrid: client is happy-path measure/crop source of truth. Server stores, runs on-demand U2Net, talks to Woo, proxies inference.
- `bdft = sqft x thickness_in` (no `/12`)
- Secrets: server AES-GCM only. Never browser.
- Online-only POC. Offline, OCR, and ruler are deferred.
- `woo_create_status` is `draft` or `publish`, default `draft`. `SLAB-UAT-*` forces Woo draft on PROD so customers never see test products.
- Health: `GET /api/health`
- Phase 0 = Gates A+B; Gate C = early Phase 1 claimable Woo draft, inference OFF
- Phase 0 covers docs freeze and run-host setup. First draft listing is early Phase 1 claimable Woo draft with inference OFF.
---
## 2. Consistent (safe for agents)
### What already agrees (safe if agents follow AGENTS)
Agents that follow **AGENTS.md §0 precedence** and ignore flagged-stale text will get these right:
Agents that follow AGENTS.md section 0 precedence and ignore flagged-stale text will get these right:
| Topic | Where it agrees |
|---|---|
| Doc precedence | AGENTS §0: TECH-SPEC → ARCHITECTURE → AGENTS → DATA/OPENAPI/CONTENT/PROMPTS/DEPLOY → IMPL Phase 0 only → PRD/README intent |
| Hybrid who-runs-what | AGENTS §1, ARCHITECTURE §§1–4, TECH-SPEC §1.5 / §9.8, README Quick orientation, PRD Architecture rewrite (post-4ec478f), DEPLOYMENT layout note (no server happy-path SoT) |
| bdft formula + TV-3 | TECH-SPEC §4.6 + TV-3; AGENTS §3; PRD FR4 patched; IMPL Phase 0; DEPLOYMENT smoke §8.4 |
| No fake upscale / ≥1600 | TECH-SPEC §5 + TV-6/7; AGENTS §2–3; IMPL Phase 0 |
| Secrets AES-GCM server | ARCHITECTURE §5; AGENTS §4; DATA-MODEL `settings`; OPENAPI SettingsView masks secrets; PRD D15 patched |
| Woo firebreak | AGENTS §5; CONTENT-WOO §2.4; DATA-MODEL `woo_create_status`; OPENAPI SettingsView; DEPLOYMENT smoke §8; README; PRD D12/FR36 |
| Slab vs Woo status | AGENTS §7; ARCHITECTURE §6; DATA-MODEL status machine; CONTENT-WOO §2.4 explicit “do not conflate” |
| Inference sequenced | AGENTS §6; ARCHITECTURE clarifications 4–5; OPENAPI infer endpoints; Gate C = OFF |
| Phase 0 hybrid scope | IMPL-PLAN Phase 0 (post-457711b) matches AGENTS; Phase 2 banner says SUPERSEDED |
| Health path | AGENTS §9; DEPLOYMENT §7–8; OPENAPI Health; IMPL Phase 0 |
| Doc precedence | AGENTS section 0: TECH-SPEC, then ARCHITECTURE, then AGENTS, then DATA/OPENAPI/CONTENT/PROMPTS/DEPLOY, then IMPL Phase 0 only, then PRD/README intent |
| Who runs what | AGENTS section 1, ARCHITECTURE sections 1 to 4, TECH-SPEC section 1.5 / 9.8, README, PRD Architecture rewrite (post-`4ec478f`), DEPLOYMENT layout note |
| bdft + TV-3 | TECH-SPEC section 4.6 + TV-3. AGENTS section 3. PRD FR4. IMPL Phase 0. DEPLOYMENT smoke section 8.4. |
| No fake upscale / at least 1600 | TECH-SPEC section 5 + TV-6/7. AGENTS sections 2 to 3. IMPL Phase 0. |
| Secrets AES-GCM server | ARCHITECTURE section 5. AGENTS section 4. DATA-MODEL `settings`. OPENAPI SettingsView. PRD D15. |
| Woo safety | AGENTS section 5. CONTENT-WOO section 2.4. DATA-MODEL `woo_create_status`. OPENAPI SettingsView. DEPLOYMENT smoke section 8. README. PRD D12/FR36. |
| Slab vs Woo status | AGENTS section 7. ARCHITECTURE section 6. DATA-MODEL. CONTENT-WOO section 2.4. |
| Inference sequenced | AGENTS section 6. ARCHITECTURE clarifications 4 to 5. OPENAPI infer endpoints. First draft listing keeps inference OFF. |
| Phase 0 hybrid scope | IMPL-PLAN Phase 0 (post-`457711b`) matches AGENTS. Phase 2 banner says SUPERSEDED. |
| Health path | AGENTS section 9. DEPLOYMENT sections 7 to 8. OPENAPI Health. IMPL Phase 0. |
**Bottom line for scaffold agents:** If they start at AGENTS + TECH-SPEC + ARCHITECTURE + IMPL Phase 0 **only**, Gate B skeleton is coherent. The landmines are in **Phases 1+/risks/PRD leftovers/OPENAPI one-liners** and the **hard-coded .201 deploy story**.
If agents start at AGENTS + TECH-SPEC + ARCHITECTURE + IMPL Phase 0 only, the run-host skeleton is coherent. The landmines sit in Phases 1+/risks/PRD leftovers/OPENAPI one-liners and the hard-coded `.201` deploy story.
---
## 3. Remaining contradictions / landmines
### Remaining contradictions
Severity: **blocker** = will cause wrong code if followed; **warn** = likely wrong path / wasted work; **nit** = wording drift, low blast radius.
Severity:
### BLOCKER
- **Blocker**: wrong code if followed
- **Warn**: likely wrong path or wasted work
- **Nit**: wording drift, low blast radius
#### B1. OPENAPI: “Server re-runs derived math when inputs change”
- **Where:** `docs/OPENAPI.md` → `PUT /api/v1/slabs/{id}` bullet (~L154)
- **What agents might do wrong:** Implement server-side recompute of sqft/bdft/widths as SoT on PUT — directly violates AGENTS §3 / TECH-SPEC §1.5 / §9.8 (“server stores the numbers the client sends”).
- **Recommended fix (draft only):** Change to: server **stores** client-sent derived fields; may validate shape/ranges; **must not** recompute mask/sqft/bdft as authoritative. Client re-runs TECH-SPEC math and PUTs new numbers.
#### Blockers
#### B2. IMPL-PLAN Phase 1 invents `processing→ready` status
- **Where:** `docs/IMPL-PLAN.md` Phase 1 (~L75): “Status state machine + in-process job queue (**processing→ready**).”
- **What agents might do wrong:** Add a `processing` slab status and a server job that “processes” photos toward `ready` — reintroduces server happy-path pipeline under a new name.
- **Recommended fix:** Rewrite Phase 1 to hybrid: CRUD + upload stores **client-calibrated** payloads; status machine = `draft → calibrated → ready → publishing → published|failed` only; queue only for publish/inference/U2Net-on-demand — never for measure/crop.
**B1. OPENAPI says server re-runs derived math when inputs change.**
Where: `docs/OPENAPI.md`, `PUT /api/v1/slabs/{id}` (around L154).
Wrong path: Implement server-side recompute of sqft/bdft/widths as source of truth on PUT. Violates AGENTS section 3 and TECH-SPEC sections 1.5 / 9.8.
Fix: Server stores client-sent derived fields. May validate shape/ranges. Must not recompute mask/sqft/bdft as authoritative. Client re-runs TECH-SPEC math and PUTs new numbers.
#### B3. IMPL-PLAN Phase 2 body still specifies offline/OCR/ruler (banner insufficient for careless agents)
- **Where:** `docs/IMPL-PLAN.md` Phase 2 (~L86–106). Banner says SUPERSEDED, but Goal/Deliverables/Acceptance/Exit still demand Tesseract OCR, OpenCV.js ruler, Workbox, IndexedDB, airplane-mode UAT.
- **What agents might do wrong:** Implement the body (agents often skim past blockquotes). Builds the exact “do not build” list in AGENTS §2.
- **Recommended fix:** Replace Phase 2 body with a short stub: “Deferred post-POC. Capture UX lives in early Phase 1 / Gate C (online hybrid). See AGENTS §2.” Delete OCR/ruler/offline acceptance lines.
**B2. IMPL-PLAN Phase 1 invents a `processing` to `ready` status.**
Where: `docs/IMPL-PLAN.md` Phase 1 (around L75).
Wrong path: Add a `processing` slab status and a server job that "processes" photos toward `ready`. Reintroduces the old server pipeline under a new name.
Fix: Rewrite Phase 1 to hybrid. CRUD + upload stores client-calibrated payloads. Status machine is only `draft` to `calibrated` to `ready` to `publishing` to `published` or `failed`. Queue only for publish, inference, and U2Net-on-demand. Never for measure/crop.
#### B4. IMPL-PLAN Phase 6 UAT still requires offline capture + OCR + “server normalization”
- **Where:** `docs/IMPL-PLAN.md` Phase 6 (~L181–183, L175–179)
- **What agents might do wrong:** Write UAT scripts / perf budgets for OCR 1–2s and server normalization 3–5s; gate exit on offline capture — contradicts online-only POC and client SoT.
- **Recommended fix:** UAT suite = hybrid online path; drop offline capture requirement; perf = client measure/crop budgets + U2Net-on-demand only; inventory host via `APP_*` (see §4).
**B3. IMPL-PLAN Phase 2 body still specifies offline, OCR, and ruler.**
Where: `docs/IMPL-PLAN.md` Phase 2 (around L86 to L106). Banner says SUPERSEDED, but Goal/Deliverables/Acceptance/Exit still demand Tesseract OCR, OpenCV.js ruler, Workbox, IndexedDB, airplane-mode UAT.
Wrong path: Implement the body. Builds the exact "do not build" list in AGENTS section 2.
Fix: Replace Phase 2 body with a short stub: "Deferred post-POC. Capture UX lives in early Phase 1 / first draft listing (online hybrid). See AGENTS section 2." Delete OCR/ruler/offline acceptance lines.
#### B5. Deploy SoT still hard-codes `.201` / `slab.tyubumini.local` (Gate B blocker per review package)
- **Where:** `AGENTS.md` §9; `docs/DEPLOYMENT.md` title/target/§1/§4/§6/§7; `README.md` L6; `docs/IMPL-PLAN.md` Phase 0 Gate B (.201 inventory), Phase 6, Risks, DoD; PRD FR42 / deploy bullets
- **What agents might do wrong:** Bake `192.168.1.201` / `slab.tyubumini.local` into compose, Caddy, health URLs, runbooks; treat TyUBUMini as mandatory; skip inventory worksheet; block on wrong host.
- **Recommended fix:** Apply workspace outline `/workspace/slabuploader-env-agnostic-doc-outline.md` — `APP_HOST` / `APP_HOSTNAME` / ports; `deploy/INVENTORY.md`; historical lab as non-normative callout only. **Do not push until CoS lifts HOLD.**
**B4. IMPL-PLAN Phase 6 UAT still requires offline capture, OCR, and "server normalization".**
Where: `docs/IMPL-PLAN.md` Phase 6 (around L181 to L183, L175 to L179).
Wrong path: Write UAT scripts and perf budgets for OCR 1 to 2s and server normalization 3 to 5s. Gate exit on offline capture.
Fix: UAT suite is the hybrid online path. Drop offline capture. Perf is client measure/crop budgets plus U2Net-on-demand only. Inventory host via `APP_*` (see env-agnostic section).
**B5. Deploy docs still hard-code `.201` / `slab.tyubumini.local`.**
Where: `AGENTS.md` section 9. `docs/DEPLOYMENT.md` title/target/sections 1, 4, 6, 7. `README.md` L6. `docs/IMPL-PLAN.md` Phase 0 Gate B (.201 inventory), Phase 6, Risks, DoD. PRD FR42 / deploy bullets.
Wrong path: Bake `192.168.1.201` / `slab.tyubumini.local` into compose, Caddy, health URLs, runbooks. Treat TyUBUMini as mandatory. Skip inventory worksheet.
Fix: Apply `/workspace/slabuploader-env-agnostic-doc-outline.md`. Use `APP_HOST` / `APP_HOSTNAME` / ports and `deploy/INVENTORY.md`. Historical lab as non-normative callout only. Do not push until CoS lifts HOLD.
#### Warns
**W1. OPENAPI create returns `status: draft` for a "calibrated draft".**
Where: `docs/OPENAPI.md` `POST /api/v1/slabs` (around L146 to L147).
Wrong path: Skip `calibrated` entirely. Conflate "photos taken" draft with "mask+numbers uploaded" calibrated. Break first-draft-listing poll/UI assumptions.
Fix: POST after client confirm returns `201` with `status: calibrated` (align ARCHITECTURE section 6, DATA-MODEL, AGENTS section 7).
**W2. AGENTS says "TV-10 only after TECH-SPEC defines it," but TECH-SPEC already has TV-10.**
Where: `AGENTS.md` section 3 (around L80) vs `docs/TECH-SPEC-PIPELINE.md` section 8 TV-10 Rounding (around L192 to L196).
Wrong path: Skip rounding unit tests thinking TV-10 is undefined.
Fix: AGENTS should say "Port TV-1 through TV-10." IMPL Phase 0 acceptance should include TV-10.
**W3. DATA-MODEL / OPENAPI put sheet prefs in server `settings`. ARCHITECTURE/AGENTS say localStorage.**
Where: DATA-MODEL settings keys `user_sensitivity|edge_offset|feather|sheet_mode` (around L184). OPENAPI SettingsView (around L132 to L133). Versus AGENTS section 4 / ARCHITECTURE section 5.
Wrong path: Dual-write prefs to SQLite AES settings table, or encrypt non-secrets, or fight over which wins on load.
Fix: Remove sheet/slider prefs from server settings schema, or mark optional sync later. Keep localStorage as source of truth for POC.
**W4. CONTENT-WOO media upload says "JPEG bytes". TECH-SPEC output is transparent PNG.**
Where: `docs/CONTENT-WOO.md` section 2.4 (around L114) vs TECH-SPEC section 5 / PRD FR31.
Wrong path: Re-encode processed PNGs to JPEG and lose alpha before Woo media upload.
Fix: Say "PNG bytes (processed inventory images)." Mention Woo accepts image/*. Keep alpha.
**W5. CONTENT-WOO tag auto-assign still says `[character]` / optional `[species]` tags.**
Where: `docs/CONTENT-WOO.md` section 2.3 (around L81 to L83) vs DATA-MODEL / PRD D8: `fig-*` + `feat-*` only.
Wrong path: Create non-fig/feat Woo tags named after character strings. Ignore feat-* mapping.
Fix: Rewrite section 2.3 to match DATA-MODEL: fig-* (1+) + feat-* (0+ from Call 1). No generic character/species tag invent.
**W6. PRD FR17 vs D8 / DATA-MODEL on tags.**
Where: PRD FR17 "Tags: fig-* only, 1+ required" vs Decisions log #8 + DATA-MODEL `fig_tag_ids` + `feat_tag_ids`.
Wrong path: Drop feat-* from schema/UI/publish payload.
Fix: FR17 should say fig-* (1+) and feat-* (0+). Cite DATA-MODEL.
**W7. PRD FR19 + pricing schema still "species and wood category".**
Where: PRD FR19 (around L134). PRD pricing schema `wood_category: string` (around L241). Versus TECH-SPEC section 6 / DATA-MODEL `pricing_rules` = species only.
Wrong path: Build wood-category pricing tiers or composite keys.
Fix: FR19 + schema become species-only. Wood-category pricing is deferred.
**W8. PRD FR40 + NFR still say "server-side processing" / "server normalization".**
Where: PRD FR40 (around L190). NFR Performance (around L200 to L201).
Wrong path: Put measure/crop on the publish path server-side. Budget 3 to 5s server normalization as a feature.
Fix: FR40 is Woo sync + status/log only (client already did processing). NFR is client local processing plus optional U2Net latency. Drop "server normalization."
**W9. DEPLOYMENT section 9 / Risks still mention RemBG, ruler, `output_px` drop to 1000.**
Where: `docs/DEPLOYMENT.md` section 9 (around L161). `docs/IMPL-PLAN.md` Risks (around L201 to L202).
Wrong path: Add RemBG server path. Lower OUTPUT_PX_MIN below 1600 (violates TECH-SPEC TV-7; undersized means retake, not a lower min).
Fix: Delete ruler row for POC or mark deferred. U2Net-on-demand only. Never drop below 1600.
**W10. Caddy fragment shape is foot-gunny.**
Where: `docs/DEPLOYMENT.md` section 4. Site-level `reverse_proxy frontend:80` plus `handle /api/* { reverse_proxy fastapi:8000 }`.
Wrong path: Ship as-written. `/api/*` may never reach fastapi depending on Caddy directive order. Health smoke fails.
Fix: Explicit `handle /api/*` to fastapi and `handle { reverse_proxy frontend }` (or `handle_path`) so API wins. Keep service name `fastapi` consistent with compose.
**W11. Calibration-photo language leftovers in CONTENT-WOO.**
Where: CONTENT-WOO section 2.4 (around L116 to L117) "Calibration photos are excluded (FR2)". PRD D1 says no calibration photos exist.
Wrong path: Invent `kind=calibration` in upload meta / schema. OPENAPI/DATA-MODEL correctly only allow `inventory`.
Fix: Delete the sentence. Say "only inventory photos (kind=inventory)."
#### Nits
**N1.** DATA-MODEL / OPENAPI still say "PWA" (DATA-MODEL L7; OPENAPI Versioning L301). Risk: agents scaffold Workbox. Fix: "client" / "SvelteKit app". Offline PWA deferred.
**N2.** PRD Architecture header still "Client (mobile web / PWA)" (around L210). Body correctly says offline deferred. Fix: "Client (mobile web / SvelteKit)".
**N3.** ARCHITECTURE status line "Remaining sections TBD" (L4). Topology is locked. Stale TBD undercuts confidence. Fix: "Hybrid topology locked at docs freeze. Remaining ops sections TBD."
**N4.** TECH-SPEC status date still 2026-08-27. AGENTS docs freeze 2026-08-31. Content matches. Optional status bump.
**N5.** Review package Appendix C checklist items 1 to 7 largely done in-repo. Item 0 (env-agnostic) not done. Package preamble still reads pre-freeze in places ("AGENTS referenced, file missing"). Mark items 1 to 7 done. Keep item 0 open.
**N6.** DEPLOYMENT docs-freeze banner line-break glitch (L4 to L8). "LAN/Tailscale" sentence split across the callout. Fix when env-agnostic rewrite lands.
---
### WARN
#### W1. OPENAPI create returns slab status `draft` for a “calibrated draft”
- **Where:** `docs/OPENAPI.md` `POST /api/v1/slabs` (~L146–147): “Create a **calibrated** draft” → Returns `201` with `status: draft`
- **What agents might do wrong:** Skip `calibrated` entirely; conflate “photos taken” draft with “mask+numbers uploaded” calibrated; break Gate C poll/UI assumptions.
- **Recommended fix:** POST after client confirm → `201` with `status: calibrated` (align ARCHITECTURE §6 / DATA-MODEL / AGENTS §7). Keep local pre-upload client state out of API or document separately.
#### W2. AGENTS says “TV-10 only after TECH-SPEC defines it” — but TECH-SPEC already has TV-10
- **Where:** `AGENTS.md` §3 (~L80) vs `docs/TECH-SPEC-PIPELINE.md` §8 TV-10 Rounding (~L192–196)
- **What agents might do wrong:** Skip rounding unit tests (length 1/8", sqft/bdft 2dp, price half-up) thinking TV-10 is undefined.
- **Recommended fix:** AGENTS: “Port TV-1…**TV-10**.” IMPL Phase 0 acceptance: include TV-10.
#### W3. DATA-MODEL / OPENAPI put sheet prefs in server `settings`; ARCHITECTURE/AGENTS say localStorage
- **Where:** DATA-MODEL settings keys `user_sensitivity|edge_offset|feather|sheet_mode` (~L184); OPENAPI SettingsView (~L132–133); vs AGENTS §4 / ARCHITECTURE §5 (browser localStorage only)
- **What agents might do wrong:** Dual-write prefs to SQLite AES settings table; or encrypt non-secrets; or fight over which wins on load.
- **Recommended fix:** Remove sheet/slider prefs from server settings schema (or mark optional sync later). Keep localStorage as SoT for POC.
#### W4. CONTENT-WOO media upload says “JPEG bytes”; TECH-SPEC output is transparent PNG
- **Where:** `docs/CONTENT-WOO.md` §2.4 (~L114): `POST /media` with **JPEG** bytes; TECH-SPEC §5 / PRD FR31: transparent **PNG**
- **What agents might do wrong:** Re-encode processed PNGs to JPEG (lose alpha) before Woo media upload.
- **Recommended fix:** “PNG bytes (processed inventory images)”; mention Woo accepts image/*; keep alpha.
#### W5. CONTENT-WOO tag auto-assign still says `[character]` / optional `[species]` tags
- **Where:** `docs/CONTENT-WOO.md` §2.3 (~L81–83) vs DATA-MODEL / PRD D8: **`fig-*` + `feat-*`** only; Call 1 maps observations → feat-*
- **What agents might do wrong:** Create/assign non-fig/feat Woo tags named after character strings; ignore feat-* mapping.
- **Recommended fix:** Rewrite §2.3 to match DATA-MODEL: fig-* (1+) + feat-* (0+ from Call 1 mapping); no generic character/species tag invent.
#### W6. PRD FR17 vs D8 / DATA-MODEL on tags
- **Where:** PRD **FR17** “Tags: **fig-* only**, 1+ required” vs Decisions log #8 + DATA-MODEL `fig_tag_ids` + `feat_tag_ids`
- **What agents might do wrong:** Drop feat-* from schema/UI/publish payload.
- **Recommended fix:** FR17 → fig-* (1+) and feat-* (0+); cite DATA-MODEL.
#### W7. PRD FR19 + pricing schema still “species **and wood category**”
- **Where:** PRD FR19 (~L134); PRD pricing schema `wood_category: string` (~L241); vs TECH-SPEC §6 / DATA-MODEL `pricing_rules` = **species only** flat $/bdft; AGENTS kills figure-/category-weighted pricing for v1
- **What agents might do wrong:** Build wood-category pricing tiers or composite keys.
- **Recommended fix:** FR19 + schema → species-only; wood-category pricing = deferred/v1.5.
#### W8. PRD FR40 + NFR still “server-side processing” / “server normalization”
- **Where:** PRD FR40 (~L190); NFR Performance (~L200–201)
- **What agents might do wrong:** Put measure/crop on publish path server-side; budget 3–5s server normalization as a feature.
- **Recommended fix:** FR40 = Woo sync + status/log only (client already did processing). NFR = client local processing + optional U2Net latency; drop “server normalization” phrase.
#### W9. DEPLOYMENT §9 / Risks still RemBG, ruler, `output_px` drop to 1000
- **Where:** `docs/DEPLOYMENT.md` §9 (~L161) RemBG/GPU on .201; `docs/IMPL-PLAN.md` Risks (~L201–202) ruler + `output_px` can drop to 1000
- **What agents might do wrong:** Add RemBG server path; lower OUTPUT_PX_MIN below 1600 (violates TECH-SPEC TV-7 / no inventing pixels — undersized → retake, not lower min).
- **Recommended fix:** Risks: delete ruler row for POC or mark deferred; U2Net-on-demand only (not RemBG as SoT); never drop below 1600 — retake.
#### W10. Caddy fragment shape is foot-gunny
- **Where:** `docs/DEPLOYMENT.md` §4 — site-level `reverse_proxy frontend:80` **plus** `handle /api/* { reverse_proxy fastapi:8000 }`
- **What agents might do wrong:** Ship as-written; `/api/*` may never reach fastapi depending on Caddy directive order; health smoke fails.
- **Recommended fix:** Use explicit `handle /api/*` → fastapi and `handle { reverse_proxy frontend }` (or `handle_path`) so API wins; keep service name `fastapi` consistent with compose.
#### W11. Calibration-photo language leftovers in CONTENT-WOO
- **Where:** CONTENT-WOO §2.4 (~L116–117) “Calibration photos are excluded (FR2)” — PRD D1 says **no calibration photos exist**
- **What agents might do wrong:** Invent `kind=calibration` in upload meta / schema (OPENAPI/DATA-MODEL correctly only `inventory`).
- **Recommended fix:** Delete sentence; say “only inventory photos (kind=inventory).”
---
### NIT
#### N1. DATA-MODEL / OPENAPI still say “PWA”
- **Where:** DATA-MODEL L7 “so the **PWA** can reference…”; OPENAPI Versioning L301 “The **PWA** pins…”
- **Risk:** Agents scaffold Workbox “because the contract says PWA.”
- **Fix:** “client” / “SvelteKit app”; offline PWA deferred.
#### N2. PRD section header still “Client (mobile web / PWA)”
- **Where:** PRD Architecture (~L210) — body correctly says offline deferred, but header says PWA.
- **Fix:** “Client (mobile web / SvelteKit)”.
#### N3. ARCHITECTURE status line “Remaining sections TBD”
- **Where:** ARCHITECTURE L4 — topology is locked; stale “TBD” undercuts confidence.
- **Fix:** “Hybrid topology locked Gate A; remaining ops sections TBD.”
#### N4. TECH-SPEC status date still 2026-08-27; AGENTS Gate A 2026-08-31
- **Nit only** — content matches. Optional status bump.
#### N5. Review package Appendix C checklist items 1–7 largely done in-repo; item 0 (env-agnostic) **not** done
- Package preamble still reads like pre-Gate-A in places (“AGENTS referenced, file missing”) — workspace draft drift vs `457711b`/`4ec478f`. Mark appendix C items 1–7 done; keep item 0 open.
#### N6. DEPLOYMENT Gate A banner line-break glitch
- **Where:** `docs/DEPLOYMENT.md` L4–8 — “LAN/Tailscale” sentence split across Gate A callout (“only — Decision”). Readable but ugly; fix when env-agnostic rewrite lands.
---
## 4. Env-agnostic gap (workspace drafts vs repo still saying .201)
### Env-agnostic gap
| Artifact | Role | Normative host? |
|---|---|---|
| **Repo** `AGENTS.md` §9, `docs/DEPLOYMENT.md`, `README.md`, `IMPL-PLAN.md` Gate B/Phase 6/DoD, PRD FR42 | Current SoT agents will read | **Yes — hard-codes `.201` / TyUBUMini / `slab.tyubumini.local` / `192.168.1.201`** |
| **Workspace-only** `/workspace/slabuploader-poc-review-package.md` §3 | Proposed SoT for deploy; **not in repo** | **No** — `APP_HOST` / `APP_HOSTNAME` / inventory worksheet; lab example non-normative |
| **Workspace-only** `/workspace/slabuploader-env-agnostic-doc-outline.md` | Patch outline for CoS-signed amend | Same |
| Repo: `AGENTS.md` section 9, `docs/DEPLOYMENT.md`, `README.md`, `IMPL-PLAN.md` Gate B / Phase 6 / DoD, PRD FR42 | Current source of truth agents will read | Yes. Hard-codes `.201` / TyUBUMini / `slab.tyubumini.local` / `192.168.1.201`. |
| Workspace: `/workspace/slabuploader-poc-review-package.md` section 3 | Proposed deploy source of truth. Not in repo. | No. Uses `APP_HOST` / `APP_HOSTNAME` / inventory worksheet. Lab example is non-normative. |
| Workspace: `/workspace/slabuploader-env-agnostic-doc-outline.md` | Patch outline for CoS-signed amend | Same |
**Explicit:** these two markdown files are **workspace drafts, not SoT yet**. Agents must not treat `/workspace/*.md` as repo authority. Until the env-agnostic amend lands under CoS HOLD lift, Gate B inventory step is blocked if agents assume `.201` is mandatory — and equally blocked if they invent a different host without inventory.
These two workspace markdown files are drafts, not source of truth yet. Agents must not treat `/workspace/*.md` as repo authority. Until the env-agnostic amend lands under CoS HOLD lift, run-host inventory is blocked if agents assume `.201` is mandatory, and equally blocked if they invent a different host without inventory.
Product locks (hybrid, bdft, Woo firebreak) are **independent** of this gap and already in-repo.
Product locks (hybrid, bdft, Woo safety) are independent of this gap and already in-repo.
---
## 5. Recommended next doc patches when CoS lifts HOLD (ordered, small)
### Recommended next doc patches when CoS lifts HOLD
Docs-only. No scaffold/code. No reopen of hybrid/Woo/bdft locks.
Docs only. No scaffold or code. Do not reopen hybrid, Woo, or bdft locks.
1. **Env-agnostic deploy cut (Gate B unblocker)** — per `/workspace/slabuploader-env-agnostic-doc-outline.md`:
- `AGENTS.md` §9 → inventory-first + `https://${APP_HOSTNAME}/api/health`; lab example callout only
- `docs/DEPLOYMENT.md` title/target/§1→`deploy/INVENTORY.md` worksheet; Caddy `${APP_HOSTNAME}`; fix handle order (W10); drop RemBG SoT smell (W9)
- `README.md` deploy line; PRD FR42 / deploy bullets; `IMPL-PLAN` Gate B / Phase 6 / Risks / DoD host wording
2. **OPENAPI one-liners (B1, W1)** — PUT does not recompute SoT; POST returns `calibrated`
3. **AGENTS TV-10 (W2)** — require TV-1…TV-10
4. **IMPL-PLAN Phase 1 (B2)** — kill `processing→ready`; hybrid CRUD/store language
5. **IMPL-PLAN Phase 2 (B3)** — replace body with deferred stub (keep banner or delete section content)
6. **IMPL-PLAN Phase 6 + Risks (B4, W9)** — online UAT only; no OCR/offline/server-normalization budgets; no `output_px`→1000
7. **CONTENT-WOO (W4, W5, W11)** — PNG media; fig-*/feat-* assign; no calibration photos
8. **DATA-MODEL / OPENAPI settings (W3, N1)** — drop server sheet prefs (or defer); “client” not “PWA”
9. **PRD leftovers (W6–W8, N2)** — FR17 feat-*; FR19 species-only; FR40/NFR hybrid wording; pricing schema
10. **Refresh workspace review package** — mark Appendix C items 1–7 done; keep item 0 + sign-off for env-agnostic only (avoid agents re-doing Gate A)
1. **Env-agnostic deploy cut (run-host unblocker).** Per `/workspace/slabuploader-env-agnostic-doc-outline.md`:
- `AGENTS.md` section 9 becomes inventory-first + `https://${APP_HOSTNAME}/api/health`. Lab example is a callout only.
- `docs/DEPLOYMENT.md` title/target/section 1 point at `deploy/INVENTORY.md` worksheet. Caddy uses `${APP_HOSTNAME}`. Fix handle order (W10). Drop RemBG SoT smell (W9).
- `README.md` deploy line. PRD FR42 / deploy bullets. `IMPL-PLAN` Gate B / Phase 6 / Risks / DoD host wording.
2. **OPENAPI one-liners (B1, W1).** PUT does not recompute source of truth. POST returns `calibrated`.
3. **AGENTS TV-10 (W2).** Require TV-1 through TV-10.
4. **IMPL-PLAN Phase 1 (B2).** Kill `processing` to `ready`. Hybrid CRUD/store language.
5. **IMPL-PLAN Phase 2 (B3).** Replace body with deferred stub.
6. **IMPL-PLAN Phase 6 + Risks (B4, W9).** Online UAT only. No OCR/offline/server-normalization budgets. No `output_px` to 1000.
7. **CONTENT-WOO (W4, W5, W11).** PNG media. fig-*/feat-* assign. No calibration photos.
8. **DATA-MODEL / OPENAPI settings (W3, N1).** Drop server sheet prefs (or defer). Say "client" not "PWA".
9. **PRD leftovers (W6 to W8, N2).** FR17 feat-*. FR19 species-only. FR40/NFR hybrid wording. Pricing schema.
10. **Refresh workspace review package.** Mark Appendix C items 1 to 7 done. Keep item 0 plus sign-off for env-agnostic only.
**After patches:** single docs commit on gitea-atd; report SHA to CoS; **then** Gate B inventory on designated host — still no silent `.201` assumption.
After patches: one docs commit on gitea-atd, report SHA to CoS, then run-host inventory on the designated host. Still no silent `.201` assumption.
---
### Audit verdict (blunt)
### Audit verdict
Gate A **did** land the critical product locks (hybrid, bdft, AES, Woo draft/`SLAB-UAT-*`, Phase 0 rewrite, AGENTS precedence). Scaffolding Gate B **math/AES/health** is safe if agents obey AGENTS + TECH-SPEC + Phase 0.
The docs freeze did land the critical product locks: hybrid, bdft, AES, Woo draft/`SLAB-UAT-*`, Phase 0 rewrite, AGENTS precedence. Scaffolding run-host math/AES/health is safe if agents obey AGENTS + TECH-SPEC + Phase 0.
Gate B **deploy** and any agent that reads **IMPL Phase 1/2/6, OPENAPI PUT, or PRD FR40/NFR** without the precedence discipline will still ship wrong architecture (server recompute, `processing` status, offline/OCR/ruler, JPEG-without-alpha, hard-coded `.201`).
Highest-ROI doc fixes when HOLD lifts: **(1) env-agnostic deploy**, **(2) OPENAPI “re-runs derived math”**, **(3) gut IMPL Phase 2/6 stale bodies**, **(4) Phase 1 status machine**.
Run-host deploy, and any agent that reads IMPL Phase 1/2/6, OPENAPI PUT, or PRD FR40/NFR without the precedence discipline, will still ship the wrong architecture: server recompute, `processing` status, offline/OCR/ruler, JPEG without alpha, hard-coded `.201`.
Highest-ROI doc fixes when HOLD lifts: (1) env-agnostic deploy, (2) OPENAPI "re-runs derived math", (3) gut IMPL Phase 2/6 stale bodies, (4) Phase 1 status machine.