Files
veripath/docs/validation/2026-08-15-gilmore-heating-air/REPORT-final.md
T
Leonard 394d5dae3f feat(auditing): pipeline v1.1 — report generation + scripted gate + temporal delta
- report_generate.py: REPORT-final.md + VALIDATION.md from findings + raw
  capture; per-surface status from summary.surfaces_ok; Data Limitations
- report_gate.py: §6 gate scripted (count/evidence/identity/material
  support); non-zero exit blocks delivery
- audit_diff.py: before/after capture comparison -> DELTA.md
- audit_pipeline.sh: 2 steps -> 4; collision-safe capture copy (re-runs
  preserve baseline); relative output dir resolved to absolute
- beta-audit-process.md: locked v1.0 -> v1.1 (+ dated decision record)
- all 9 runs of the 2026-08-15 batch regenerated + gated (9/9 PASS)
- live end-to-end proof: Gilmore re-run, DELTA.md 0 changes (same day)
2026-08-15 16:52:23 +00:00

6.6 KiB
Raw Blame History

Gilmore Heating, Air and Plumbing

Online Presence Audit

Location: Antelope, CA
Vertical: HVAC
Audit date: 15 August 2026
Prepared for: Gilmore Heating, Air and Plumbing
Prepared by: VeriPath


Executive Summary

We audited Gilmore Heating, Air and Plumbing across its primary online surfaces: Google Business Profile and Apple Maps. The business shows 4.8 ★ across 3,860 Google reviews. 8 material integrity issues were identified:

  1. Phone numbers are inconsistent across directories.
  2. Address details differ between Google and Apple.
  3. Business hours are inconsistent between Google and Apple.
  4. The website URL does not align across directories.
  5. Average rating is below the 4.0 trust threshold.
  6. No website could be located for this business.
  7. Ratings vary across surfaces.
  8. No business description is set on any directory.

Surfaces Reviewed

Surface Status Rating Reviews
Google Business Profile 4.8 ★ 3,860
Apple Maps 2.5 ★ 272
Bing Places capture blocked (bot-wall) — excluded, not verified
Website not found / unreachable at audit time

Limitation: The website could not be reached or located at audit time. A blocked or missing website is itself a customer-path risk: visitors arriving from search cannot engage the business. Reachability should be re-verified; if the block persists, treat it as a material finding in the next run.


Findings

Finding 1: Phone number inconsistent across directories

Observation:
Google lists (530) 290-5551. Apple lists +1 (916) 866-5596.

Impact:
Customers reaching the business through a single directory may call a disconnected or wrong number. Inconsistent NAP (name-address-phone) signals reduce local search ranking across all surfaces.

Recommendation:
Confirm the correct primary number, then update every directory to match. Keep the verified number identical across Google, Apple, and the website.


Finding 2: Address inconsistent across directories

Observation:
Google lists “8636 Antelope North Rd Bldg D, Antelope, CA 95843”. Apple Maps lists “8636 Antelope North Rd, Antelope, CA 95843”.

Impact:
Conflicting addresses split local search signals and can send customers or service vehicles to the wrong location. NAP consistency is a core local-ranking factor.

Recommendation:
Confirm the canonical street address (including unit) with the business, then align Google and Apple to the same string.


Finding 3: Hours mismatch between Google and Apple

Observation:
saturday: Google “Open 24 hours” vs Apple “12:00 AM-12:00 PM”; sunday: Google “Open 24 hours” vs Apple “12:00 AM-12:00 PM”; monday: Google “Open 24 hours” vs Apple “12:00 AM-12:00 PM”; tuesday: Google “Open 24 hours” vs Apple “12:00 AM-12:00 PM”; wednesday: Google “Open 24 hours” vs Apple “12:00 AM-12:00 PM”; thursday: Google “Open 24 hours” vs Apple “12:00 AM-12:00 PM”; friday: Google “Open 24 hours” vs Apple “12:00 AM-12:00 PM”

Impact:
Customers planning a visit see different availability depending on which directory they use. Mismatched hours drive no-shows and lost calls at the edge of the workday.

Recommendation:
Verify actual operating hours with the business. Update the non-authoritative surface to match Google's verified schedule, or correct Google if its hours are inaccurate.


Finding 4: Website URL inconsistent across directories

Observation:
Google lists https://gilmoreair.com/service-areas/antelope/?utm_source=GBP-listing&utm_medium=organic&utm_campaign=antelope-ca. Apple Maps lists https://gilmoreair.com.

Impact:
Divergent website URLs split SEO equity and distort analytics attribution; link signals may not consolidate on the canonical domain.

Recommendation:
Point every directory at the canonical website URL (https, no tracking parameters) and consolidate redirects so link equity consolidates on one domain.


Finding 5: Average rating 3.6 — below 4.0 threshold

Observation:
Blended average is 3.65 (Google 4.8, Apple 2.5) — below the 4.0 trust threshold.

Impact:
A sub-4.0 average is below the trust threshold for most local verticals and suppresses click-through in the local pack regardless of review volume.

Recommendation:
Review the lower-rated reviews for recurring service issues; respond publicly to negative reviews and prioritize the service gaps they describe.


Finding 6: Website listed on GBP but unreachable at audit time

Observation:
GBP website='https://gilmoreair.com/service-areas/antelope/?utm_source=GBP-listing&utm_medium=organic&utm_campaign=antelope-ca' — surface blocked; documented limitation per process §4

Impact:
Without a website, the business cedes its owned property: no service pages, no schema, no conversion path beyond a phone call. AI search surfaces increasingly require a website to cite.

Recommendation:
Stand up (or link on GBP) a business website with service pages, contact details, and LocalBusiness schema.


Finding 7: Rating varies by 2.3 across surfaces (range: 2.54.8)

Observation:
Google shows 4.8 ★ while Apple Maps shows 2.5 ★.

Impact:
A rating spread across surfaces undermines the consistency signal local search relies on and can suppress the lower-rated surface in results.

Recommendation:
Verify which rating is current; the stale surface usually reflects an unmanaged listing that has stopped receiving reviews.


Finding 8: No business description found on any surface

Observation:
no description on any checked surface — weakens local-pack snippet

Impact:
An empty description leaves the local-pack snippet to algorithmic default and forfeits the business's own service language in search results.

Recommendation:
Write a 2-3 sentence GBP description covering services, service area, and differentiators.


Data Limitations

This audit ran without authenticated access to the business's listings. Known ceilings:

  • Review text and dates were not captured; ratings and counts only.
  • Bing Places is bot-walled for headless capture in most runs; where it shows ✗ above, that surface is excluded from this audit, not verified.
  • This is a point-in-time snapshot; directory data changes after the audit date.

Prepared under the VeriPath beta audit process v1.1. Findings reflect reviewed engine output; format-level discrepancies were normalized before inclusion.