Files
veripath/docs/validation/2026-08-15-diamond-springs-dental/VALIDATION.md
T
tonyjbala 40a5f38000 docs(validation): beta audit batch 2026-08-15 — 8 reviewed runs
Reviewer disposition pass applied per locked process v1.0 (docs/operations/beta-audit-process.md):
- Each run: raw capture, findings.json, findings.md, REPORT-final.md (customer-facing), VALIDATION.md (reviewer dispositions)
- Normalized format false-positives (+1 prefix, #N vs Ste N, 8AM vs 8:00AM, 1800 scraper parse glitch)
- Material: 28 across batch (phone mismatches, NAP address conflicts, hours divergences, missing LocalBusiness schema, missing website)
- Verification-pending items separated from material findings; no surface presented without evidence
2026-08-15 13:57:46 +00:00

2.3 KiB

Validation Run: Diamond Springs Dental Center

Date: 2026-08-15 Business: Diamond Springs Dental Center Rating: 3.4 ★ | Reviews: 49 Engine findings: 11 | Material (in report): 4 | Rejected FP/low-signal: 5 | Needs verification: 0

Reviewer dispositions (locked process v1.0 §3)

Material (survive normalization → in REPORT-final.md)

  • immediate — Phone number inconsistent across 2 surface(s)
    distinct numbers: 5302911888, 5303440290, 5510858478
  • immediate — Address inconsistent across 1 surface(s)
    google='6400 Pleasant Valley Rd, El Dorado, CA 95623' vs apple='493 Pleasant Valley Rd, Ste 110, Diamond Springs, CA 95619'
  • immediate — Average rating 3.3 — below 4.0 threshold
    average 3.35 (google 3.4 / apple 3.3)
  • high — No JSON-LD schema found on website
    no structured data at https://www.diamondspringsdental.com/

Needs verification (excluded from report until confirmed)

  • none

Rejected (format false-positives / low-signal / tooling gaps)

  • Hours mismatch on 4 day(s) — GBP is authoritative — format only: '8 AM' vs '8:00 AM' — identical after parse
  • Website URL inconsistent across 1 surface(s) — same domain; http/https or www only
  • Review count varies by 21 across surfaces — low-signal: platforms count reviews differently; not an integrity issue
  • Cannot determine review recency — no dates available in samples — tooling gap: scraper captures no review dates (documented limitation)
  • Category varies across surfaces: dental clinic, health care — low-signal: per-platform taxonomy (Apple 'consumer sector' is its default)

Enhancement tier (noted, excluded from client report)

  • Only 0% of sample reviews mention specific services or practitioners
  • Price level not set on GBP or Apple Maps

Pre-delivery consistency gate (v1.0 §6)

  • Count match: executive summary states 4; Findings section contains 4
  • Evidence present: every cited value exists in findings.json / raw capture
  • Identity match: name, location, and date match intake record

Generated by normalization pass (review_pass rules). Reviewer: dispositions above are the standing review for this run; re-run before any client use if the raw capture is re-fetched.