# Validation Run: Above the Gate Dentistry

**Date:** 2026-08-15
**Business:** Above the Gate Dentistry
**Rating:** 4.9 ★ | **Reviews:** 166
**Engine findings:** 10 | **Material (in report):** 3 | **Rejected FP/low-signal:** 5 | **Needs verification:** 0

## Reviewer dispositions (locked process v1.0 §3)

### Material (survive normalization → in REPORT-final.md)

- **immediate** — Phone number inconsistent across 1 surface(s)  
  `distinct numbers: 9162998983, 9169311996`
- **high** — Website listed on GBP but unreachable at audit time  
  `GBP website='http://www.abovethegate.com/' — surface blocked; documented limitation per process §4`
- **medium** — No business description found on any surface  
  `no description on any checked surface — weakens local-pack snippet`

### Needs verification (excluded from report until confirmed)

- none

### Rejected (format false-positives / low-signal / tooling gaps)

- ~~Address inconsistent across 1 surface(s)~~ — same street/city/zip; suite format only (# vs Ste vs Unit)
- ~~Hours mismatch on 5 day(s) — GBP is authoritative~~ — format only: '8 AM' vs '8:00 AM' — identical after parse
- ~~Review count varies by 139 across surfaces~~ — low-signal: platforms count reviews differently; not an integrity issue
- ~~Cannot determine review recency — no dates available in samples~~ — tooling gap: scraper captures no review dates (documented limitation)
- ~~Category varies across surfaces: dentist, health care~~ — low-signal: per-platform taxonomy (Apple 'consumer sector' is its default)

### Enhancement tier (noted, excluded from client report)

- Only 0% of sample reviews mention specific services or practitioners
- Price level not set on GBP or Apple Maps

## Pre-delivery consistency gate (v1.0 §6)
- Count match: executive summary states 3; Findings section contains 3 ✅
- Evidence present: every cited value exists in findings.json / raw capture ✅
- Identity match: name, location, and date match intake record ✅

*Generated by normalization pass (review_pass rules). Reviewer: dispositions above are the standing review for this run; re-run before any client use if the raw capture is re-fetched.*