Add DOP Vertical Prioritization Matrix (29 verticals + clients, scored)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
|
||||
# DOP Vertical Prioritization Matrix
|
||||
*Source: 29 bizl.com industry pages + 5 Bizl case studies (committed to Gitea `research/bizl-com/`).*
|
||||
*Filled by Leonard/Hermes 2026-08-09. Honest, no fluff.*
|
||||
|
||||
## Scoring rules
|
||||
- **SCL (Silent Customer Loss Severity, 1–5):** How bad if AI skips them? Crisis-intent / emergency / high-urgency = 5.
|
||||
- **LTV (1–5):** Money one good client pays over time. Recurring + high-ticket + long retention = 5.
|
||||
- **FIT (1–5):** Ease of showing value via Cold Audit → PoC → Retainer. Clear "near me" queries + citation gaps + human-oversight edge = 5.
|
||||
- **Priority** = average(SCL, LTV, FIT), rounded 2dp.
|
||||
- **Existing Client Signal** = DOP/Tony proof only (Phoenix Salon + Spa, Overcome Fitness). Bizl's case studies are *competitor* proof — noted in Why, not counted as ours.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Matrix (sorted by Priority desc)
|
||||
|
||||
| Industry | SCL | LTV | FIT | Priority | Existing Client | Why / Notes |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| **HVAC** | 5 | 4 | 4 | **4.33** | No | Crisis heat/cold snap, "thousands lost immediately." DOP human-verified emergency availability = differentiator. Bizl HVAC case study validates motion. |
|
||||
| **Dentists** | 4 | 5 | 4 | **4.33** | No | Highest per-customer LTV (implants/Invisalign). Insurance-matched searchers ready to book. Medical-schema human oversight = DOP edge. Bizl dentist case study. |
|
||||
| **Law Firms** | 4 | 5 | 4 | **4.33** | No | Top LTV. Bizl's free 4-min audit maps 1:1 to DOP Cold Audit→PoC. "Attorney near me" = high-intent. Bizl law case study. |
|
||||
| **Accounting** | 4 | 5 | 4 | **4.33** | No | "Stay 10 years" LTV framing. Regulated → data-consistency weighted → human oversight edge. Longer sales cycle. |
|
||||
| **Home Renovation** | 4 | 5 | 4 | **4.33** | No | High-consideration, high-ticket (kitchen remodel). Long research window = AI answer controls the shortlist. |
|
||||
| **Veterinarians** | 5 | 4 | 4 | **4.33** | No | Emergency vet = highest-converting query. Long patient lifetime + referrals. Most practices have unclaimed Foursquare. |
|
||||
| **Multi-Location** | 4 | 4 | 5 | **4.33** | No | Systemic loss across N sites. Cold Audit scales perfectly across locations. Highest aggregate LTV. Ideal retainer motion. |
|
||||
| **Financial Services** | 4 | 5 | 3 | **4.00** | No | 65% of Perplexity users high-income. Regulated consistency weighted. Slower PoC. |
|
||||
| **Franchises** | 4 | 4 | 4 | **4.00** | No | Systemic loss across units. PoC across locations = leverage. |
|
||||
| **Auto Repair** | 5 | 3 | 4 | **4.00** | No | Breakdown crisis, first-mover compounding. Mostly one-off but urgent. |
|
||||
| **Contractors** | 4 | 4 | 4 | **4.00** | No | High-ticket jobs (scrape corrupted "$0,000-$0,000" — re-scrape needed). License-accuracy = DOP human-verify edge. |
|
||||
| **Electricians** | 5 | 3 | 4 | **4.00** | No | Emergency = fastest-converting, highest-urgency. Mostly one-off. |
|
||||
| **Plumbers** | 5 | 3 | 4 | **4.00** | No | Strongest crisis-intent "competitor gets that call" framing. Easiest Cold Audit win (emergency query visibility). Bizl emergency-plumbing case study. |
|
||||
| **Optometrists** | 4 | 4 | 4 | **4.00** | No | Annual eye-exam stickiness, insurance-ready searchers. VSP/Healthgrades indexing. |
|
||||
| **Pest Control** | 5 | 3 | 4 | **4.00** | No | Extreme urgency ("first credible result"). Recurring service = retainer fit. |
|
||||
| **Transportation** | 4 | 4 | 4 | **4.00** | No | NEMT/ADA/senior = high-value recurring bookings. Licensing gaps silently tank confidence. |
|
||||
| **Chiropractors** | 4 | 3 | 4 | **3.67** | No | Recurring visibility compounds. Healthcare = human-oversight differentiator. |
|
||||
| **Medical Clinics** | 4 | 4 | 3 | **3.67** | No | Emergency/"accepting patients" high-value. Heavy compliance → slower PoC. |
|
||||
| **Insurance** | 4 | 4 | 3 | **3.67** | No | Recurring policies. Regulated consistency. Templated hook. |
|
||||
| **Mortgage** | 3 | 5 | 3 | **3.67** | No | One-time high-value, long research window. AI answer controls shortlist during research. |
|
||||
| **Gym / Fitness** | 3 | 4 | 4 | **3.67** | **Yes (Overcome Fitness)** | Membership recurring LTV. Active redesign client — see Overcome row. |
|
||||
| **Salon & Beauty** | 3 | 3 | 4 | **3.33** | **Yes (Phoenix Salon + Spa)** | Recurring local queries. Active client — see Phoenix row. |
|
||||
| **Real Estate** | 3 | 4 | 3 | **3.33** | No | One transaction, high value, long research. AI answer = shortlist gate. |
|
||||
| **Landscaping** | 3 | 3 | 4 | **3.33** | No | Seasonal demand spikes. Recurring but not crisis. |
|
||||
| **Moving Companies** | 4 | 3 | 3 | **3.33** | No | Licensed/insured verification gates recommendation. Mostly one-off. |
|
||||
| **Pharmacies** | 3 | 4 | 3 | **3.33** | No | Independent vs chains slow bleed. Recurring scripts. |
|
||||
| **Marketing Agencies** | 2 | 3 | 2 | **2.33** | No | Sophisticated buyers resist "silent loss" framing. They are peers/competitors, not ideal clients. |
|
||||
| **Restaurants** | 2 | 2 | 2 | **2.00** | No | Low per-customer value. AI discovery less decisive for dining. |
|
||||
| **Retail Stores** | 2 | 2 | 2 | **2.00** | No | Low per-customer. AI discovery less decisive. |
|
||||
|
||||
### Existing-client instance rows (DOP proof)
|
||||
| Client | SCL | LTV | FIT | Priority | Existing Client | Why / Notes |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| **Phoenix Salon + Spa** | 3 | 3 | 4 | **3.33** | **Yes — active** | GBP audit + site redesign delivered. Proof the Salon & Beauty vertical converts under DOP. |
|
||||
| **Overcome Fitness** | 3 | 4 | 4 | **3.67** | **Yes — active** | Redesign in progress. Proof Gym/Fitness vertical. Membership LTV. |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Top 5 recommended verticals for DOP first
|
||||
|
||||
1. **HVAC** — Crisis-intent + high-ticket + immediate loss. DOP's human-verified emergency availability is a real differentiator Bizl can't claim. Bizl case study proves the vertical responds.
|
||||
2. **Plumbers** — Purest crisis-intent ("competitor gets that call"). Easiest Cold Audit win (emergency-query visibility is measurable in 48h). Bizl emergency-plumbing case study validates.
|
||||
3. **Law Firms** — Highest LTV, and Bizl's own free-audit→retainer motion maps 1:1 to DOP's Cold Audit→PoC→Retainer. "Attorney near me" = high-intent, low-friction PoC.
|
||||
4. **Dentists** — Highest per-customer LTV (implants/Invisalign), insurance-matched searchers ready to book, service-specific queries are clean PoC targets. Medical-schema human oversight = DOP edge.
|
||||
5. **Multi-Location** — Systemic loss across N sites; Cold Audit scales perfectly and aggregate LTV is highest. Best retainer motion (recurring across locations).
|
||||
|
||||
**Why these five:** all sit in the 4.00–4.33 tier, all have clear "near me" / emergency / high-intent queries that make a Cold Audit visibly valuable fast, and four of five have Bizl case-study proof the vertical converts (de-risks the pitch). Multi-Location adds scale/retainer upside.
|
||||
|
||||
## Industries to avoid for now
|
||||
- **Restaurants (2.00), Retail Stores (2.00)** — low per-customer value, AI discovery is not the deciding factor for these buyers.
|
||||
- **Marketing Agencies (2.33)** — sophisticated buyers who resist the "silent loss" narrative; they are competitors/peers, not clients.
|
||||
- **Defer (don't avoid, just later):** Accounting, Financial Services, Medical Clinics, Insurance — high LTV but regulated/consistency-weighted → longer PoC and heavier compliance overhead. Strong, but not first-wave.
|
||||
|
||||
## Data-integrity flags
|
||||
- **Contractors scrape corrupted:** dollar amounts rendered as "$0,000-$0,000" — re-scrape `11-industry-contractors.md` before using its LTV figure externally.
|
||||
- **Bizl case studies (dentist, emergency plumbing, HVAC, law, roofer)** are *competitor* proof the vertical responds to GEO — useful for our pitch framing, NOT DOP's own client proof.
|
||||
- **Roofer** appears only as a Bizl case study (file 58), not one of the 29 industry verticals — excluded from the vertical table by design.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user