diff --git a/research/bizl-com/47-compare-bizl-vs-growthpro.md b/research/bizl-com/47-compare-bizl-vs-growthpro.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2abc81f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/research/bizl-com/47-compare-bizl-vs-growthpro.md
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+# Bizl vs GrowthPro AI (Compare Page)
+URL: https://bizl.com/compare/bizl-vs-growthpro
+Extracted: 2026-08-09
+
+## Core Messaging / Positioning
+- Hero: "**GrowthPro AI is software you manage. Bizl is a team that manages it for you.**"
+- Positioning: "GrowthPro AI is a powerful local SEO automation platform. Bizl is a done-for-you service. Same goal, fundamentally different model. Here is how to choose."
+- Honest concession: "If you enjoy managing platforms and have the time to learn the dashboard, it is genuinely capable."
+- Differentiator: Bizl = **fully managed / done-for-you** (installs schema, runs the platform) vs GrowthPro = self-managed SaaS dashboard.
+- Key visual/claim: "**Bizl installs schema for you.**"
+- CTA: "Run a free audit and see exactly where you stand across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, and Grok, and what we would fix first."
+
+## Key Claims & Stats
+- No quantified performance stats on the captured text (no percentages or measurable results) — UNSUPPORTED comparative claims are qualitative ("you manage vs we manage").
+- Price markers: **$1,995 one-time** (Bizl) vs **$79/mo** and **$149/loc/mo** (GrowthPro per-location pricing).
+- Implicit claim: Bizl tracks AI visibility across **ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, and Grok** and installs schema done-for-you.
+- "See your AI visibility score in 4 minutes" (free-audit claim).
+- No source cited for any claim (Tier-3).
+
+## Offer / Pricing Details (if applicable)
+- Pricing appears as comparison anchors: Bizl **$1,995 one-time**; GrowthPro **$79/mo** (base) and **$149/loc/mo** (multi-location).
+- "Full feature comparison" table referenced but not captured.
+- Free audit entry: no sales call implied, score in "4 minutes."
+
+## Process / How It Works
+- Implied model contrast: GrowthPro = business owner learns/manages dashboard; Bizl = team handles (installs schema, runs the work) while the owner does nothing.
+- A "Which one is right for you?" scoping block referenced but not captured.
+
+## Notable Strengths or Patterns
+- Frames the competitor as **more work for the owner** ("software you manage") vs Bizl as removing burden — strong anti-labor / convenience angle for time-poor local owners.
+- Names GrowthPro's real strength (capable dashboard) then pivots: capability is worthless if you have no time to learn it.
+- Pricing transparency as comparison: one-time fee vs per-location recurring.
+- Free-audit CTAs throughout to capture leads.
+
+## Notes for Digital Operations Partner
+- **Human supervision vs black-box**: The page's entire axis is "DIY software vs done-for-you team." Notably, both are still black-box on method. DOP can differentiate as done-for-you PLUS **human-supervised + transparent** — same labor-saving, added accountability.
+- **Evidence quality**: No measured results here (Tier-3 qualitative claims). DOP can back claims with measured before/after.
+- **Silent Customer Loss**: Underlying sell is that self-managed SaaS users silently miss AI visibility because they don't maintain it; DOP surfaces this with evidence.
+- **PoC-style entry**: free audit (4 min) → done-for-you service; aligns with DOP Cold Audit → PoC → Retainer.
+- **Conversion patterns**: convenience framing, honest concession, price anchoring (one-time vs per-location monthly), free-audit CTAs.
+<!-- structured: 3289 chars, flags: 2 -->