diff --git a/research/bizl-com/48-compare-bizl-vs-otterly-ai.md b/research/bizl-com/48-compare-bizl-vs-otterly-ai.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0730e65
--- /dev/null
+++ b/research/bizl-com/48-compare-bizl-vs-otterly-ai.md
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+# Bizl vs Otterly AI (Compare Page)
+URL: https://bizl.com/compare/bizl-vs-otterly-ai
+Extracted: 2026-08-09
+
+## Core Messaging / Positioning
+- Hero: "**Otterly shows you the problem. Bizl fixes it.**"
+- Positioning: "Both track your AI visibility. Only one submits your citations, installs your schema, and optimizes your GBP. Here is the full comparison."
+- Category labels: Otterly = a "**monitoring tool**"; Bizl = a "**done-for-you service**".
+- Key claim: "**Bizl monitors and fixes.**" (Otterly only monitors.)
+- CTA: "Run a free audit and get your AI Visibility Score, competitor comparison, and a clear picture of what we would fix first."
+
+## Key Claims & Stats
+- No quantified performance stats on the captured text — claims are qualitative (monitor vs monitor-and-fix). No source cited (Tier-3).
+- Price markers: **$1,995 one-time** (Bizl) vs **$29/mo** (Otterly).
+- Implicit claim: Otterly tracks AI visibility but does NOT submit citations, install schema, or optimize GBP (Google Business Profile) — Bizl does all four.
+- Free audit: "AI Visibility Score, competitor comparison."
+
+## Offer / Pricing Details (if applicable)
+- Pricing as comparison anchors: Bizl **$1,995 one-time**; Otterly **$29/mo**.
+- "Full feature comparison" table referenced but not captured.
+- Free audit entry (AI Visibility Score + competitor comparison).
+
+## Process / How It Works
+- Implied funnel: free audit → Bizl team does the fixing (citations, schema, GBP optimization) after monitoring.
+- Monitoring-only ("shows you the problem") vs monitoring+execution ("fixes it").
+
+## Notable Strengths or Patterns
+- **Action-gap framing**: sells the difference between "seeing" and "doing" — monitoring alone leaves the owner to act.
+- Clean category labeling ("monitoring tool" vs "done-for-you service") makes the choice seem obvious.
+- Named specific action levers (citations, schema, GBP) signals concrete work tasks.
+- Free-audit CTAs with a scope teaser (score + competitor comparison).
+
+## Notes for Digital Operations Partner
+- **Silent Customer Loss framing**: The page's core sell — a monitoring tool reveals the problem but leaves fixing to the (busy) owner, so AI visibility silently stays broken — is exactly the discovery-failure/path-leakage pattern DOP should flag with measured evidence.
+- **Human supervision vs black-box**: Bizl = done-for-you fixes; Otterly = self-serve monitoring. Both opaque on method. DOP = human-supervised + agent-assisted, transparent about what is fixed and why.
+- **Evidence quality**: No numbers here (Tier-3). DOP can convert "we fix it" into verified before/after results.
+- **PoC-style entry**: free audit → paid service matches DOP Cold Audit → PoC → Retainer.
+- **Conversion patterns**: monitor-vs-fix action gap, category labeling, price anchoring, free-audit CTAs.
+<!-- structured: 2805 chars, flags: 2 -->