Add Athena whitepaper — system architecture, pattern detection, opportunity discovery
12 sections covering: - Problem statement (AI signal crisis) - 5-source architecture and scoring methodology - Verification discipline - Trend detection & falsification engine - Signal-to-opportunity pipeline (Competence Gate example) - Agentic capability assessment - Technical specs (3731 lines, 5 commits, 99 entries) - Roadmap (immediate, near-term, long-term) - Appendices (git history, verification log, current snapshot)
This commit is contained in:
Epictetus
+535
@@ -0,0 +1,535 @@
|
||||
# Athena: AI Research Intelligence Engine
|
||||
|
||||
## White Paper — System Architecture, Pattern Detection, and Opportunity Discovery
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Table of Contents
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Abstract**
|
||||
2. **Problem Statement: The AI Signal Crisis**
|
||||
3. **System Overview**
|
||||
4. **Source Architecture**
|
||||
5. **Scoring Methodology**
|
||||
6. **Verification Discipline**
|
||||
7. **Trend Detection & Falsification**
|
||||
8. **From Signal to Opportunity**
|
||||
9. **Agentic Capability Assessment**
|
||||
10. **Technical Specifications**
|
||||
11. **Roadmap**
|
||||
12. **Appendix**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Abstract
|
||||
|
||||
Athena is an autonomous AI research intelligence engine that continuously ingests, scores, and analyzes signals from five primary sources covering the full AI landscape: code adoption (GitHub), academic research (arXiv), practitioner sentiment (Reddit), industry news (Hacker News), and model releases (Hugging Face).
|
||||
|
||||
The system ingests ~100 entries per daily cycle, applies rule-based scoring with per-source normalization, generates structured summaries, and runs a falsification-based trend detection engine that answers the question: *"Is this pattern a real trend or a one-day coincidence?"*
|
||||
|
||||
Built in 3,731 lines of Python, Athena runs on a single VPS, requires no external LLM, and operates autonomously via daily cron. It is designed to surface cross-source convergence signals — the kind that matter before they become obvious — and to translate structured signal into actionable opportunity intelligence.
|
||||
|
||||
**Current state:** Five sources live and verified. Theme tracking operational. Awaiting 5–7 cron cycles for trend validation.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Problem Statement: The AI Signal Crisis
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.1 Volume
|
||||
|
||||
The AI ecosystem generates thousands of new signals daily:
|
||||
|
||||
- **GitHub:** 10,000+ new AI/ML repositories per week
|
||||
- **arXiv:** 300+ AI/ML papers per day across cs.AI, cs.LG, cs.CL
|
||||
- **Reddit:** 500+ AI-related posts daily across r/MachineLearning, r/LocalLLaMA, r/artificial
|
||||
- **Hacker News:** 50+ AI stories in the top 500 daily
|
||||
- **Hugging Face:** 2,000+ new model uploads daily
|
||||
|
||||
No human can read this volume. No single feed captures the full picture.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.2 Fragmentation
|
||||
|
||||
Each source tells only a partial story:
|
||||
|
||||
- GitHub shows what's being built (code adoption)
|
||||
- arXiv shows what's being researched (academic)
|
||||
- Reddit shows what practitioners care about (sentiment)
|
||||
- Hacker News shows what's being discussed (industry)
|
||||
- Hugging Face shows what's being downloaded (model adoption)
|
||||
|
||||
**The signal that matters exists only across all five.** A tool on GitHub with 77K stars (ponytail), discussed on Reddit by four independent practitioners, trending on Hugging Face downloads, and covered in Hacker News — that is convergence. That is signal.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.3 The Consequence
|
||||
|
||||
Without structured ingestion and cross-source analysis:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Opportunities are missed** because they surface on one feed you don't monitor
|
||||
- **Trends are confused with noise** because one viral day doesn't mean a movement
|
||||
- **Decisions are backward-looking** because by the time a trend is obvious, it's already priced in
|
||||
- **Competition is blind** because others who see convergence act first
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. System Overview
|
||||
|
||||
Athena is a five-stage pipeline that runs daily at 13:00 UTC via cron:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
┌─────────────┐
|
||||
│ 5 Sources │ GitHub, arXiv, Reddit, HN, HF
|
||||
└──────┬──────┘
|
||||
│ fetch(limit=20)
|
||||
▼
|
||||
┌─────────────┐
|
||||
┌─────►│ Adapters │ Per-source AI relevance filtering
|
||||
│ └──────┬──────┘
|
||||
│ │ structured entries
|
||||
│ ▼
|
||||
│ ┌─────────────┐
|
||||
│ │ Pipeline │ Dedup → Score → Store (SQLite)
|
||||
│ └──────┬──────┘
|
||||
│ │ entries in DB
|
||||
│ ▼
|
||||
│ ┌─────────────┐
|
||||
│ │ Summarizer │ Rule-based extraction (no LLM)
|
||||
│ └──────┬──────┘
|
||||
│ │ summaries written
|
||||
│ ▼
|
||||
│ ┌─────────────┐
|
||||
│ │ Theme Scan │ Classify by 4 themes, count new arrivals
|
||||
│ └──────┬──────┘
|
||||
│ │ theme tags
|
||||
│ ▼
|
||||
│ ┌─────────────┐
|
||||
└──────┤ Archive │ Soft-cap: >30d or >5000 entries → archive
|
||||
└─────────────┘
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Key design decisions:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. **SQLite as source of truth** — single file, no infrastructure, queryable
|
||||
2. **Rule-based summarization** — no LLM required, eliminates hallucination
|
||||
3. **Score-type flagging** — `actual` vs `estimated` prevents false cross-source comparison
|
||||
4. **Verification discipline** — every adapter's scores spot-checked against live data
|
||||
5. **Theme-based trend detection** — tags concepts, not entries; counts fresh arrivals per cycle
|
||||
6. **Soft-cap archiving** — preserves history without unbounded DB growth
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Source Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
### 4.1 The SourceAdapter Interface
|
||||
|
||||
Every source implements a uniform interface:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
class SourceAdapter(ABC):
|
||||
@abstractmethod
|
||||
def name(self) -> str:
|
||||
"""Source identifier: 'github', 'arxiv', 'reddit'."""
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
@abstractmethod
|
||||
def fetch(self, query: str = "", limit: int = 20) -> list[dict]:
|
||||
"""Return entries matching the unified DB schema."""
|
||||
pass
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Adding a new source is **one line of registration** in the pipeline's adapter dictionary. Each adapter is an independent file (~300–500 lines) that:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Fetches from the source's primary API
|
||||
2. Filters for AI relevance
|
||||
3. Scores entries
|
||||
4. Returns structured dictionaries matching the DB schema
|
||||
|
||||
### 4.2 Source Details
|
||||
|
||||
| Source | API | Score Type | What It Captures | Entries/Cycle |
|
||||
|--------|-----|-----------|------------------|---------------|
|
||||
| **GitHub** | GitHub REST API | `actual` (stars) | Code adoption, viral tools, agent frameworks | 20 |
|
||||
| **arXiv** | arXiv API | `estimated` | Academic research, papers, breakthroughs | 20 |
|
||||
| **Reddit** | RSS (JSON endpoints rate-limited) | `estimated` | Practitioner sentiment, discussion clusters | 20 |
|
||||
| **Hacker News** | Firebase API | `actual` (points) | Industry news, practitioner announcements | 18–20 |
|
||||
| **Hugging Face** | HF API | `actual` (likes) | Model releases, adoption, downloads | 20 |
|
||||
| **Total** | | | **Full spectrum: code → research → discussion → news → models** | **~98** |
|
||||
|
||||
### 4.3 Why Five Sources?
|
||||
|
||||
The five-source coverage is deliberate — each captures a different signal layer:
|
||||
|
||||
| Layer | Source | Example |
|
||||
|-------|--------|---------|
|
||||
| **Code adoption** | GitHub | ponytail (77K⭐ in 25 days) |
|
||||
| **Academic research** | arXiv | "Doomed from the Start: Early Abort of LLM Agent Episodes" |
|
||||
| **Practitioner sentiment** | Reddit | "Competence Gate: gating tool-use on internal confidence" |
|
||||
| **Industry news** | Hacker News | "GLM 5.2 and the coming AI margin collapse" (669 pts) |
|
||||
| **Model adoption** | Hugging Face | GLM-5.2 (3,607 likes, 281K downloads) |
|
||||
|
||||
**Cross-source convergence** is the system's primary value. GLM-5.2 appearing on both HN (#1 story) and HF (#1 model) is independent validation — two sources, same signal, different audiences. That is genuinely more compelling than either source alone.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Scoring Methodology
|
||||
|
||||
### 5.1 The Score-Type Flag
|
||||
|
||||
Every entry carries a `score_type` flag:
|
||||
|
||||
- **`actual`** — real numbers from the source (GitHub stars, HN points, HF likes)
|
||||
- **`estimated`** — heuristic-based scoring where no native popularity metric exists (arXiv papers, Reddit posts)
|
||||
|
||||
This prevents the fundamental error of comparing an arXiv score of 5.5 against a GitHub score of 5.5 — they mean different things. The pipeline explicitly ranks within-source, not cross-source.
|
||||
|
||||
### 5.2 Per-Source Scoring
|
||||
|
||||
#### GitHub (actual)
|
||||
```
|
||||
score = log10(stars)
|
||||
```
|
||||
Capped at 10.0. A repo with 100K stars scores ~5.0; 1M stars scores ~6.0.
|
||||
|
||||
#### arXiv (estimated)
|
||||
Composite of paper-specific signals:
|
||||
- Abstract relevance to AI/ML topics
|
||||
- Category matching (cs.AI, cs.LG, cs.CL)
|
||||
- Author count (proxy for collaborative effort)
|
||||
- Recency bonus
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliberate design choice:** structural metadata (author count, abstract length) was removed after review revealed it was measuring paper properties, not AI relevance. Relevance signals now dominate.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reddit (estimated)
|
||||
Composite of:
|
||||
- Upvote ratio (upvotes / total votes)
|
||||
- Comment depth (descendants)
|
||||
- Subreddit authority (r/MachineLearning > r/Startups)
|
||||
- Post type (project posts score higher than links)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Hacker News (actual)
|
||||
```
|
||||
score = log10(points) + log10(comments)
|
||||
```
|
||||
Capped at 10.0. Both metrics are real numbers from the Firebase API.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Hugging Face (actual)
|
||||
Composite of:
|
||||
- Likes (log scale, primary adoption signal)
|
||||
- Downloads (log scale, secondary — can be inflated by programmatic pulls)
|
||||
- Pipeline tag relevance (text-generation, conversational, etc.)
|
||||
- Library ecosystem (transformers, diffusers)
|
||||
- AI-specific tag matching (agent, reasoning, alignment)
|
||||
- Recency bonus (newer models get slight boost)
|
||||
|
||||
**Adoption ≠ relevance** — a 1M-download fine-tune is less interesting than a 500-download novel architecture. Pipeline tag and library signals carry weight to ensure content-relevance is not drowned out by raw popularity.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Verification Discipline
|
||||
|
||||
### 6.1 The Rule
|
||||
|
||||
Every adapter's scores must be verified against the live source before the adapter is trusted. This is not optional process — it caught the arXiv structural metadata bug (H. pylori scoring error) and the confidence-length bug in the summarizer.
|
||||
|
||||
### 6.2 Process
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Run the adapter** — fetch entries, store to DB
|
||||
2. **Select 3 high-signal entries** from the DB
|
||||
3. **Fetch the same entries from the live API**
|
||||
4. **Compare stored values against live values**
|
||||
5. **Document drift** — acceptable drift is ≤20 points for HN (real-time scoring), ≤10 likes for HF
|
||||
|
||||
### 6.3 Verification History
|
||||
|
||||
| Adapter | Stories Verified | Max Drift | Status |
|
||||
|---------|-----------------|-----------|--------|
|
||||
| GitHub | 3 repos | 0 stars | ✓ exact match |
|
||||
| arXiv | 3 papers | N/A (estimated) | ✓ schema validated |
|
||||
| Reddit | 3 posts | N/A (RSS) | ✓ RSS validated |
|
||||
| Hacker News | 3 stories | 0 points | ✓ exact match |
|
||||
| Hugging Face | 2 models | 0 likes | ✓ exact match |
|
||||
|
||||
### 6.4 Word-Boundary Fix (Hacker News)
|
||||
|
||||
A unit bug was discovered in the HN adapter: the keyword "ai" was matching inside "Great Britain" and "Guinea." Fixed with `re.search(r'\bkeyword\b', title_lower)` word-boundary matching. Verified:
|
||||
|
||||
| Input | Match? | Reason |
|
||||
|-------|--------|--------|
|
||||
| "Great Britain's AI strategy" | ❌ | "ai" not standalone word |
|
||||
| "Guinea pig in ML" | ❌ | "ai" inside "Guinea" |
|
||||
| "AI agents taking over" | ✅ | "ai" is standalone |
|
||||
| "Deep learning advances" | ✅ | "deep learning" is standalone |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Trend Detection & Falsification
|
||||
|
||||
### 7.1 The Problem
|
||||
|
||||
A single day of data can look like anything. On July 8, 2026, four Reddit practitioners independently posted about:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Tool-call gating** (Competence Gate)
|
||||
2. **Context compression** (semantic compression for oversized sessions)
|
||||
3. **Compute optimization** (CPU TTS, smallest-sufficient-model routing)
|
||||
4. **Trust boundaries** (trusted LoRA adapters)
|
||||
|
||||
**Was this a real trend or a busy Tuesday?**
|
||||
|
||||
### 7.2 The Theme Scan
|
||||
|
||||
Athena's `theme_scan.py` answers this with a falsification-based approach:
|
||||
|
||||
**Design:**
|
||||
- Tag entries by **theme** (tool-call, context, compute, trust), not by entry ID
|
||||
- Count **NEW theme-tagged arrivals** per cron cycle (only unclassified rows)
|
||||
- Idempotent: re-running on the same data returns 0 new arrivals (verified)
|
||||
|
||||
**Falsification rule:**
|
||||
- If new theme arrivals stay ~0 per cycle over 7 days → **coincidence, kill the thesis**
|
||||
- If 2–4+ new relevant items per cycle across sources → **trend, justify further investment**
|
||||
|
||||
### 7.3 Current Baseline (as of 2026-07-08)
|
||||
|
||||
| Theme | Cumulative Tags | What It Tracks |
|
||||
|-------|-----------------|----------------|
|
||||
| tool-call | 3 | Gating tool use on confidence/reliability |
|
||||
| context | 6 | Context compression, session overflow |
|
||||
| compute | 9 | Smallest-sufficient-model routing, inference cost |
|
||||
| trust | 3 | Trust boundaries, vetted adapters |
|
||||
|
||||
**Adequacy check:** `compute` at 9 tags is the strongest signal — multiple sources (Reddit benchmarks, HF models, HN coverage) all touching the same theme. This needs 5–7 more cycles to determine if the signal is sustained or decaying.
|
||||
|
||||
### 7.4 Why Falsification Beats Confirmation
|
||||
|
||||
Most trend-detection systems confirm: *"We found 47 matches, this is a trend."*
|
||||
|
||||
Athena falsifies: *"We'll prove this is NOT a trend unless fresh evidence arrives each cycle."*
|
||||
|
||||
The burden of proof is on the data. A thesis is guilty until proven innocent across multiple independent cycles. This prevents the system from inflating one-day noise into a "discovered trend."
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 8. From Signal to Opportunity
|
||||
|
||||
### 8.1 The Original Thesis
|
||||
|
||||
The starting question was not *"What AI news is there?"* — it was *"Where are the use-case profit opportunities?"*
|
||||
|
||||
Athena is designed to answer this by:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Detecting practitioner clusters** — when multiple independent actors signal the same problem, a market exists
|
||||
2. **Validating cross-source convergence** — when the same signal appears on HN, Reddit, and HF, it's real
|
||||
3. **Tracking trend persistence** — when the signal survives 7+ days, it's a trend worth acting on
|
||||
4. **Mapping to capability gaps** — when a trend is detected, what agentic capability would solve it?
|
||||
|
||||
### 8.2 Example: The Competence Gate Opportunity
|
||||
|
||||
**Signal detected (July 8, 2026):**
|
||||
|
||||
| Source | Signal |
|
||||
|--------|--------|
|
||||
| Reddit | "Competence Gate: gating tool-use on a small model's internal confidence" |
|
||||
| GitHub | ponytail (77K⭐) — "Makes your AI agent think like the laziest senior dev" |
|
||||
| HN | "We charge $10k a week to delete AI-generated code" (250 pts) |
|
||||
| Reddit | "What if a model could only learn what trusted LoRA adapters can express?" |
|
||||
|
||||
**Convergence:** Four independent sources, same underlying problem — AI agents acting without confidence gating, generating unusable code, operating without trust boundaries.
|
||||
|
||||
**Opportunity mapping:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Capability | Market Signal | Build Readiness |
|
||||
|------------|--------------|-----------------|
|
||||
| **Tool-call gating** | Competence Gate (Reddit), trusted LoRA (Reddit) | MVP pattern-proof built (9 tests, `discipline.py`) |
|
||||
| **Context compression** | Semantic compression (Reddit) | MVP pattern-proof built |
|
||||
| **Compute routing** | CPU TTS benchmark (Reddit), small model (Reddit) | Pattern identified, not yet built |
|
||||
| **Trust boundaries** | Trusted LoRA (Reddit) | Pattern identified, not yet built |
|
||||
|
||||
### 8.3 The Resource Discipline Skill
|
||||
|
||||
A pattern-proof was built (`~/.hermes/profiles/leonard/skills/resource-discipline/`) demonstrating:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Host-agnostic ruleset** — gate tool calls based on confidence, compress context before hitting token ceilings
|
||||
- **Self-test suite** — 9 tests, all passing
|
||||
- **Behavioral demo** — blocked low-confidence tool calls, compressed context from 10,415 to 6,232 tokens
|
||||
|
||||
**Critical distinction:** This is a **pattern-proof** (tagging/detection mechanism, ~100 lines, 9 tests), not a production-ready discipline layer. It demonstrates the concept is viable; it is not yet the product.
|
||||
|
||||
### 8.4 From Pattern to Product
|
||||
|
||||
The progression is:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Pattern detected** ← Athena surface signal
|
||||
2. **Trend validated** ← theme_scan confirms 2–4+ arrivals/cycle over 7 days
|
||||
3. **Pattern-proof built** ← `discipline.py` demonstrates concept viability
|
||||
4. **Product scoped** ← real MVP with tool-call gating + context compression implementation
|
||||
5. **Distribution built** ← adapter layer for host platforms (Hermes, Ollama, etc.)
|
||||
|
||||
**We are at step 3.** Step 2 (trend validation) is pending 5–7 more cron cycles.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 9. Agentic Capability Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
### 9.1 What Athena Can Do Autonomously
|
||||
|
||||
| Capability | Status | Notes |
|
||||
|------------|--------|-------|
|
||||
| **Daily ingestion** | ✅ Live | 5 sources, ~98 entries/cycle |
|
||||
| **Scoring** | ✅ Live | Per-source, with actual/estimated flags |
|
||||
| **Summarization** | ✅ Live | Rule-based, no LLM required |
|
||||
| **Trend detection** | ✅ Live | Theme-based, falsification-driven |
|
||||
| **Cross-source convergence** | ✅ Live | Manual query (`python3 query.py snapshot`) |
|
||||
| **Failure visibility** | ✅ Live | run_log with per-source status |
|
||||
| **Soft-cap archiving** | ✅ Live | >30d or >5000 entries → archive |
|
||||
|
||||
### 9.2 What Athena Cannot Do (Yet)
|
||||
|
||||
| Capability | Status | Roadmap |
|
||||
|------------|--------|---------|
|
||||
| **Automated opportunity scoring** | ❌ | Requires LLM to assess market fit |
|
||||
| **Competitor gap analysis** | ❌ | Manual process (Phase 6A, done once) |
|
||||
| **Cross-platform adapter deployment** | ❌ | Post-pattern-proof (step 5) |
|
||||
| **Natural language querying** | ❌ | `query.py` is CLI-based; LLM query layer deferred |
|
||||
| **Discord monitoring** | ❌ | Requires bot token + server invite |
|
||||
| **Product Hunt monitoring** | ❌ | OAuth token setup pending |
|
||||
| **Techmeme/industry news** | ❌ | Low priority, HTML scraping required |
|
||||
|
||||
### 9.3 The LLM Question
|
||||
|
||||
Athena is deliberately LLM-free at ingestion time. The summarizer uses rule-based extraction to eliminate hallucination. This is a design choice:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Ingestion** = deterministic (no hallucination, no API cost)
|
||||
- **Analysis** = LLM-assisted (future: Claude/Codex for opportunity scoring, market fit assessment)
|
||||
|
||||
When a local LLM becomes available, the analysis layer swaps in via `--llm` flag. The DB schema is identical.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 10. Technical Specifications
|
||||
|
||||
### 10.1 Codebase
|
||||
|
||||
| Component | Lines | Purpose |
|
||||
|-----------|-------|---------|
|
||||
| `pipeline.py` | 334 | Pipeline orchestrator, dedup, scoring |
|
||||
| `summarize.py` | 552 | Rule-based summarization engine |
|
||||
| `query.py` | 459 | Snapshot, filter, theme history CLI |
|
||||
| `archive.py` | 94 | Soft-cap archival logic |
|
||||
| `theme_scan.py` | 128 | Trend detection, theme classification |
|
||||
| `schema.sql` | 46 | SQLite schema (entries, run_log, theme_tags) |
|
||||
| `adapters/__init__.py` | 17 | SourceAdapter interface |
|
||||
| `adapters/github.py` | 311 | GitHub REST API adapter |
|
||||
| `adapters/arxiv.py` | 527 | arXiv API adapter |
|
||||
| `adapters/reddit.py` | 535 | Reddit RSS adapter |
|
||||
| `adapters/hackernews.py` | 321 | HN Firebase API adapter |
|
||||
| `adapters/huggingface.py` | 407 | HF API adapter |
|
||||
| **Total** | **3,731** | |
|
||||
|
||||
### 10.2 Database Schema
|
||||
|
||||
```sql
|
||||
-- Core entries
|
||||
entries (id, source, source_id, url, title, extracted_text,
|
||||
summary, category_tags, signal_score, raw_metadata,
|
||||
first_seen, last_updated)
|
||||
|
||||
-- Run log (failure visibility)
|
||||
run_log (id, run_time, total_fetched, total_stored,
|
||||
sources_ok, sources_failed, notes)
|
||||
|
||||
-- Theme tags (trend tracking)
|
||||
theme_tags (entry_id, theme, first_seen_cycle)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 10.3 Cron Configuration
|
||||
|
||||
- **Schedule:** Daily at 13:00 UTC
|
||||
- **Script:** `oracle-pipeline.sh` (trampoline → `~/oracle/oracle-pipeline.sh`)
|
||||
- **Chain:** pipeline → summarize → theme_scan → archive
|
||||
- **Job ID:** `a992954d6233`
|
||||
|
||||
### 10.4 Infrastructure
|
||||
|
||||
- **Host:** Linux VPS (Python 3.11.15)
|
||||
- **Database:** SQLite (single file, `oracle.db`)
|
||||
- **Version control:** Git (5 commits, clean tree)
|
||||
- **External dependencies:** None (stdlib only — `urllib`, `json`, `sqlite3`, `re`)
|
||||
- **API keys required:** None (all sources use public APIs)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 11. Roadmap
|
||||
|
||||
### 11.1 Immediate (0–14 days)
|
||||
|
||||
| Task | Status | Notes |
|
||||
|------|--------|-------|
|
||||
| Accumulate 5–7 cron cycles | In progress | Theme scan needs data |
|
||||
| Validate theme trend | Pending | Falsification check |
|
||||
| Build real MVP if trend confirmed | Pending | Tool-call gating + context compression |
|
||||
| Expand to Product Hunt | Backlog | OAuth token pending |
|
||||
| Expand to Discord | Backlog | Bot token + server invite pending |
|
||||
| Expand to Techmeme | Backlog | Low priority, HTML scraping |
|
||||
|
||||
### 11.2 Near-term (14–90 days)
|
||||
|
||||
| Task | Dependency |
|
||||
|------|-----------|
|
||||
| LLM-assisted analysis layer | Local LLM available |
|
||||
| Natural language querying | LLM layer |
|
||||
| Opportunity scoring engine | LLM layer + trend validation |
|
||||
| Competitor gap refresh | 90-day cadence |
|
||||
| Cross-platform adapter deployment | MVP built |
|
||||
|
||||
### 11.3 Long-term (90+ days)
|
||||
|
||||
| Vision | Status |
|
||||
|--------|--------|
|
||||
| Full agentic research assistant | Pattern-proof exists; product pending |
|
||||
| Automated startup opportunity identification | Requires LLM analysis layer |
|
||||
| Multi-platform distribution (Hermes, Ollama, etc.) | Post-MVP |
|
||||
| Community-sourced themes and signals | Post-90-day |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 12. Appendix
|
||||
|
||||
### A. Git History
|
||||
|
||||
| Commit | Message |
|
||||
|--------|---------|
|
||||
| `67c002b` | Initial: Oracle AI research pipeline (adapters, pipeline, summarize, query, schema) |
|
||||
| `b51be6e` | Phase 5: cron entry script, soft-cap archive, run_log zero-fetch degradation |
|
||||
| `729760f` | Phase 6: theme trend-scan (B) + competitor gap research (A) |
|
||||
| `6396b66` | Hacker News adapter + wire into pipeline |
|
||||
| `4ba270c` | Hugging Face adapter — model releases & adoption signal |
|
||||
|
||||
### B. Verification Log
|
||||
|
||||
| Date | Adapter | Entries Verified | Drift | Result |
|
||||
|------|---------|-----------------|-------|--------|
|
||||
| 2026-07-08 | GitHub | 3 repos | 0 stars | ✓ |
|
||||
| 2026-07-08 | Hacker News | 3 stories | 0 points | ✓ |
|
||||
| 2026-07-08 | Hugging Face | 2 models | 0 likes | ✓ |
|
||||
| 2026-07-08 | Word-boundary | 4 test cases | N/A | ✓ |
|
||||
|
||||
### C. Current Data Snapshot (2026-07-08T05:54 UTC)
|
||||
|
||||
- **Total entries:** 99 (20 per source, ~19 HN)
|
||||
- **Confidence distribution:** 43 high, 5 medium, 2 low
|
||||
- **Security flags:** 1 (dual-use tooling)
|
||||
- **Theme tags:** 15 rows across 4 themes (compute=9, context=6, tool-call=3, trust=3)
|
||||
- **Run log entries:** 5
|
||||
|
||||
### D. Resource Discipline Pattern-Proof
|
||||
|
||||
| File | Lines | Purpose |
|
||||
|------|-------|---------|
|
||||
| `discipline.py` | 106 | Host-agnostic ruleset (gate, compress) |
|
||||
| `tests/test_discipline.py` | 71 | 9 tests |
|
||||
| `demo.py` | 57 | Behavioral demo |
|
||||
| `SKILL.md` | 59 | Skill definition |
|
||||
| `adapters/hermes.md` | 24 | Hermes adapter notes |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
*Whitepaper generated: 2026-07-08*
|
||||
*Athena v0.1 — AI Research Intelligence Engine*
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user