Sprint 1.5 prep: Leonard->Architect feedback, aiND 7-tier DNA doc, Issue 002 (PROPOSED)
- docs/vision/LEONARD_FEEDBACK_TO_ARCHITECT.md: 4 resolutions (naming aiND vs Athena; T6 practitioner-gate; T1 has no engine signal yet/actionability_score reserved; ingestion audit is mandatory for indispensable editions) + 2 risks (success metric is human-only; schema forward-compatible, no change in 1.5). - docs/vision/AI_NEWS_DAILY_TIERS.md: 7-tier hierarchy + Builder-Outcome DNA + 4 editorial questions + T6 gate. LOCKED reference for edition curation. - Issue_002.md: PROPOSED hand-curated edition from live 60-story window; T1-T5 + T6 gate; founder confirmation required before 'shipped'. ~11/60 cleared Editorial Test -> exposes ingestion-supply problem. Sprint 1.5 = multiple hand editions; Lens/Memory/Narratives/KG deferred. No schema change.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
|
||||
# AI News Daily — Story Tiers & Builder-Outcome DNA
|
||||
|
||||
**Publication:** aiND (see `AI_NEWS_DAILY_VISION_V2.md`)
|
||||
**Status:** LOCKED 2026-07-15, part of Sprint 1.5 build plan
|
||||
**Authority:** Story competition order. Higher tier wins when space is limited.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## The DNA: Builder Outcomes
|
||||
|
||||
We are not primarily interested in: announcements, predictions, funding, lawsuits, CEO opinions.
|
||||
We are interested in: **what did somebody actually accomplish?**
|
||||
|
||||
Examples of Builder Outcomes:
|
||||
- Saved money
|
||||
- Saved time
|
||||
- Built something useful
|
||||
- Got customers
|
||||
- Reduced token costs
|
||||
- Increased throughput
|
||||
- Shipped a product
|
||||
- Solved a problem
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 7-Tier Hierarchy (competition order)
|
||||
|
||||
| Tier | Name | Examples | Coverage |
|
||||
|------|------|----------|----------|
|
||||
| **T1** | Builder Outcomes | "I reduced token spend 70%", "I replaced API costs with local models", "I automated my reporting", "I got my first paying customer" | Gold |
|
||||
| **T2** | What Shipped Today | New OSS projects, agents, tools, releases | High |
|
||||
| **T3** | Run It Locally | GGUF, Ollama, llama.cpp, VRAM discoveries, quantizations | High |
|
||||
| **T4** | Benchmarks & Builds | GPU testing, throughput, home-lab experiments, HW optimization | Medium |
|
||||
| **T5** | Problem Solved | Production lessons, cost reductions, workflow improvements | Medium |
|
||||
| **T6** | Important Developments | Major model releases, API changes, significant platform changes | **Practitioner-gate only** |
|
||||
| **T7** | Noise | Funding, lawsuits, CEO comments, valuations | Near-zero |
|
||||
|
||||
### T6 Practitioner Gate (mandatory)
|
||||
A T6 item is included **only if** a practitioner can act on it: must migrate an API, can run the model locally, or it changes your stack. A model release with no reproducible substance drops to T7.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## The Four Editorial Questions
|
||||
|
||||
Every candidate story should answer:
|
||||
1. **What happened?**
|
||||
2. **What was shipped?**
|
||||
3. **What useful thing did somebody accomplish?**
|
||||
4. **What can the reader do with this?**
|
||||
|
||||
The strongest stories answer all four. T1 stories always answer 3 and 4.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Engine Note (Athena)
|
||||
T1 has **no engine signal yet** — the Sprint 1 scorer measures shipping/utility/replication/enthusiast/novelty, not accomplishment. `actionability_score` is reserved (currently 0) as the future home for T1 detection. Until Sprint 2+, T1 ranking is **human curation only**.
|
||||
|
||||
## Sprint 1.5 Scope
|
||||
Produce multiple hand-curated editions (Issue 002+) from live data. No Lens, no Narratives, no Memory, no Knowledge Graph. Success metric is human: *"Would I miss today's edition if it didn't arrive?"* — not clicks, score, or rank.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user